Confidence: 51%
B07XVCD1MY
View on Amazon →Decision summary
Not a strong option overall. The product is materially held back by weaker ingredient form quality.
Best for
Very few buyers — better options are usually available.
Consider another option if
You care a lot about label clarity and want fewer unknowns.
Score breakdown
Tap a module to see what it measures. A 0 can reflect missing disclosure, not just a negative result.
Dosage quality
3.2/10Dosing looks weaker than ideal
Checks whether labeled ingredient amounts fall within clinically studied ranges (not just regulatory minimums). Low/0 can reflect under-dosing or missing amounts (e.g., proprietary blends).
Dose 3.2/10 · Bioavailability 0/10 · Coherence 0/10
Dose quality suggests a diluted formulation.
Ingredient form quality suggests suboptimal ingredient forms.
Some ingredient forms are not declared on the label.
This is a multi-ingredient product. The score reflects formulation quality, not efficacy for a specific health goal.
Vitamin-b5: dose within clinically studied range (evidence B). The main limitation is that magnesium: below clinically studied range.
Strengths
Weaknesses
Final verdict
Not a strong option overall. The product is materially held back by weaker ingredient form quality.
A closer look at the main ingredients, how they influence the score, and the supporting evidence when available. Tap any ingredient to expand.
ℹ Evidence is strong, but dose is below the optimal range
This is a limiting factor: Dose is below the ranges usually used for stronger effects. The label does not specify the form, so absorption quality cannot be verified.
Scientific evidence
Singh & Das Cochrane review zinc for common cold
Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews • 2011
PMID: 22553186.0
Prasad et al. RCT zinc supplementation and testosterone in elderly men
Nutrition • 1996
PMID: 8875519.0
⚠ Strong evidence exists, but dose is below effective threshold
One of the weaker points: Dose is likely below clinically useful levels. The label does not specify the form, so absorption quality cannot be verified.
Scientific evidence
Boyle et al. systematic review magnesium and subjective anxiety
Nutrients • 2017
PMID: 28145455.0
Dong et al. meta-analysis magnesium intake and type 2 diabetes risk
Diabetes Care • 2011
PMID: 21868780.0
ℹ Dose is within established clinical ranges, but lacks direct studies
Adequate, but not a key strength: Dose is directionally useful, but not a standout strength.
Clinical dosing guidance
Based on established dosing ranges used in clinical practice.
ℹ Clinically effective dose, but evidence is limited
Dose is well positioned: Dose is strong and within effective ranges.
Scientific evidence
Hodges et al. review on pantothenic acid physiology and human deficiency implications
Advances in Nutrition • 2020
⚠ Moderate evidence exists, but dose is below effective threshold
One of the weaker points: Dose is likely below clinically useful levels. The declared form supports strong absorption.
Scientific evidence
Norton & Layman review leucine and mTOR activation in protein synthesis
Journal of Nutrition • 2006
PMID: 16365087.0
ℹ Dose is below the optimal range with moderate supporting evidence
One of the weaker points: Dose is below the ranges usually used for stronger effects. The declared form is acceptable, but not among the best-absorbed options.
Scientific evidence
Clarke et al. meta-analysis B vitamins and cognitive decline
American Journal of Clinical Nutrition • 2007
PMID: 22243457.0
Shipton & Thachil review of vitamin B12 deficiency and fatigue
Postgraduate Medical Journal • 2015
PMID: 20648714.0
Important label or formulation details that may affect how this product should be interpreted.
Magnesium dose looks below clinically effective levels
Declared amount falls below ranges used in human trials.
Magnesium form is not clearly declared
Exact ingredient form is not disclosed on the label.
Zinc form is not clearly declared
Exact ingredient form is not disclosed on the label.
Read our methodology overview to understand how SuppScoreLab combines multiple scientific dimensions into one practical score.
View methodology →This evaluation is based on the product label and declared Supplement Facts available at review time. It does not verify laboratory-tested composition, purity, or batch-level quality. This content is educational and not medical advice. Consult a qualified healthcare professional for personal health decisions. Affiliate disclosure: SuppScoreLab may earn a commission from qualifying Amazon links.
See the best Zinc supplements ranked with the same methodology, or keep exploring the database.
