SuppScoreLab
SuppScoreLab
EVIDENCE-BASED SUPPLEMENT SCORING
5.1/10
WEAK

Confidence: 72%

Wekannufod Ashwagandha Gummies 1000mg, 60 Count – Organic Root Extract, Daily Adaptogen Gummies, Non-GMO, Sugar Free & Gluten Free

Wekannufod Ashwagandha Gummies 1000mg – Organic Root Extract, Daily Adaptogen Gummies, Non-GMO, Sugar Free & Gluten Free

B0DNWLMQXV

View on Amazon →

SuppScoreLab compares supplement products for informational purposes. We do not sell products directly, and some links may take you to third-party retailers.

Decision summary

SKIPWEAK

Not a strong option overall. The product is materially held back by weaker formulation coherence.

Compare top Ashwagandha picks

Best for

Only budget-focused buyers with flexible standards.

Consider another option if

You want one of the best-absorbed options in this category.

Score breakdown

Tap a module to see what it measures. A 0 can reflect missing disclosure, not just a negative result.

Dosage quality

1.2/10

Dosing looks weaker than ideal

Checks whether labeled ingredient amounts fall within clinically studied ranges (not just regulatory minimums). Low/0 can reflect under-dosing or missing amounts (e.g., proprietary blends).

Explore next

Best in category

Best Ashwagandha supplements

Browse by goal

Stress & mood

Ingredient guide

Ashwagandha

Multi-ingredient formulation analysis

Dose 1.2/10 · Bioavailability 5.5/10 · Coherence 0/10

Dose quality suggests a diluted formulation.

This is a multi-ingredient product. The score reflects formulation quality, not efficacy for a specific health goal.

Score summary

Vitamin-d: high-bioavailability form declared (Cholecalciferol (D3)). The main limitation is that ashwagandha: below clinically studied range.

Strengths

Vitamin-d: high-bioavailability form declared (Cholecalciferol (D3))
Potassium: high-bioavailability form declared (Potassium Citrate)
Magnesium: high-bioavailability form declared (Magnesium Glycinate)

Weaknesses

Ashwagandha: below clinically studied range
Formula coherence is weak: diluted, decorative or overly complex
Vitamin-d: below clinically studied range

Final verdict

Not a strong option overall. The product is materially held back by weaker formulation coherence.

Ingredient Analysis & Evidence

A closer look at the main ingredients, how they influence the score, and the supporting evidence when available. Tap any ingredient to expand.

⚠ Strong evidence exists, but dose is below effective threshold

Dose is below the minimum effective threshold. One of the weaker points: Dose is likely below clinically useful levels. The declared form is acceptable, but not among the best-absorbed options.

Scientific evidence

RCT

Wankhede et al. RCT ashwagandha and testosterone levels

American Journal of Men's Health • 2015

PMID: 31991540.0

RCT

Chandrasekhar et al. RCT ashwagandha and cortisol in stressed adults

Indian Journal of Psychological Medicine • 2012

PMID: 23439798.0

⚠ Strong evidence exists, but dose may be too low to be effective

A clear drag on the formula: Dose is likely below clinically useful levels. The declared form supports strong absorption.

Scientific evidence

Meta-analysis

Martineau et al. meta-analysis vitamin D supplementation and respiratory infections

BMJ • 2017

PMID: 26864360.0

Meta-analysis

Bischoff-Ferrari et al. meta-analysis vitamin D fracture prevention

BMJ • 2009

PMID: 20198382.0

⚠ Strong evidence exists, but dose is above the upper dose range

Dose is above the upper dose range. One of the weaker points: Dose is likely below clinically useful levels. The declared form supports strong absorption.

Scientific evidence

Systematic review

Boyle et al. systematic review magnesium and subjective anxiety

Nutrients • 2017

PMID: 28145455.0

Meta-analysis

Dong et al. meta-analysis magnesium intake and type 2 diabetes risk

Diabetes Care • 2011

PMID: 21868780.0

⚠ Dose is below commonly used clinical ranges

Dose is below the minimum effective threshold. This is a limiting factor: Dose is likely below clinically useful levels. The declared form supports strong absorption.

Clinical dosing guidance

Based on established dosing ranges used in clinical practice.

Min effective: 1500 mgOptimal: 2600 mgUpper: 5000 mgGrade: A

ℹ At the minimum effective range, but below the optimal dose with moderate supporting evidence

Dose meets the minimum effective range, but is below the optimal dose used for stronger effects. One of the weaker points: Dose is likely below clinically useful levels. The declared form is acceptable, but not among the best-absorbed options.

Scientific evidence

RCT

Bryan et al. RCT on B vitamins and cognitive function in older adults

American Journal of Clinical Nutrition • 2002

PMID: 16920179.0

⚠ Strong evidence exists, but dose is below effective threshold

Dose is below the minimum effective threshold. This is a limiting factor: Dose is likely below clinically useful levels.

Scientific evidence

Meta-analysis

Hoon et al. meta-analysis dietary nitrate and exercise performance

International Journal of Sport Nutrition • 2013

PMID: 25202887.0

Meta-analysis

Siervo et al. meta-analysis inorganic nitrate and blood pressure

Journal of Nutrition • 2013

PMID: 23596162.0

Wekannufod Ashwagandha Gummies 1000mg, 60 Count – Organic Root Extract, Daily Adaptogen Gummies, Non-GMO, Sugar Free & Gluten Free

Wekannufod Ashwagandha Gummies 1000mg, 60 Count – Organic Root Extract, Daily Adaptogen Gummies, Non-GMO, Sugar Free & Gluten Free

5.1/10
View on Amazon →

Warnings & notes

Important label or formulation details that may affect how this product should be interpreted.

!

Ashwagandha dose looks below clinically effective levels

Declared amount falls below ranges used in human trials.

Warning
⚠

Formula design looks less coherent than stronger alternatives

The formulation appears less focused than better-built options.

Note
!

Vitamin D dose looks below clinically effective levels

Declared amount falls below ranges used in human trials.

Warning

Methodology

Read our methodology overview to understand how SuppScoreLab combines multiple scientific dimensions into one practical score.

View methodology →

This evaluation is based on the product label and declared Supplement Facts available at review time. It does not verify laboratory-tested composition, purity, or batch-level quality. This content is educational and not medical advice. Consult a qualified healthcare professional for personal health decisions. Affiliate disclosure: SuppScoreLab may earn a commission from qualifying Amazon links.

Still comparing options?

See the best Ashwagandha supplements ranked with the same methodology, or keep exploring the database.

See best Ashwagandha supplementsBrowse database
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.