Confidence: 85%
B0C16JBYZ2
View on Amazon →Decision summary
Not a strong option overall. The product is materially held back by weaker formulation coherence.
Best for
Buyers comparing price and availability and okay with a middle-of-the-pack option.
Consider another option if
You care a lot about label clarity and want fewer unknowns.
Score breakdown
Tap a module to see what it measures. A 0 can reflect missing disclosure, not just a negative result.
Dosage quality
4.2/10Dosing looks weaker than ideal
Checks whether labeled ingredient amounts fall within clinically studied ranges (not just regulatory minimums). Low/0 can reflect under-dosing or missing amounts (e.g., proprietary blends).
Explore next
Dose 4.2/10 · Bioavailability 1.6/10 · Coherence 0/10
Dose quality suggests a diluted formulation.
Ingredient form quality suggests suboptimal ingredient forms.
This is a multi-ingredient product. The score reflects formulation quality, not efficacy for a specific health goal.
The formula stays relatively clean on excipients. The main limitation is that formula coherence is weak: diluted, decorative or overly complex.
Strengths
Weaknesses
Final verdict
Not a strong option overall. The product is materially held back by weaker formulation coherence.
A closer look at the main ingredients, how they influence the score, and the supporting evidence when available. Tap any ingredient to expand.
ℹ Dose is below the optimal range with moderate supporting evidence
A clear drag on the formula: Dose is below the ranges usually used for stronger effects.
Scientific evidence
Hamzah & Yusof RCT tongkat ali and testosterone in physically active men
British Journal of Sports Medicine • 2003
PMID: 23754792.0
⚠ Strong evidence exists, but dose is below effective threshold
This is a limiting factor: Dose is likely below clinically useful levels. The declared form is acceptable, but not among the best-absorbed options.
Scientific evidence
Hemila & Chalker Cochrane review vitamin C and common cold duration
Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews • 2013
PMID: 23440782.0
Padayatty et al. RCT on vitamin C antioxidant capacity in healthy adults
Journal of the American College of Nutrition • 2001
PMID: 11684527.0
⚠ Moderate evidence exists, but dose is below effective threshold
One of the weaker points: Dose is likely below clinically useful levels. The declared form is acceptable, but not among the best-absorbed options.
Scientific evidence
Shin et al. systematic review maca and sexual function
BMC Complementary and Alternative Medicine • 2010
PMID: 20691074.0
⚠ Moderate evidence exists, but dose is below effective threshold
One of the weaker points: Dose is likely below clinically useful levels.
Scientific evidence
Geng et al. systematic review ginseng and cognitive performance
Journal of Psychopharmacology • 2010
PMID: 20570032.0
Barton et al. RCT American ginseng and cancer-related fatigue
Journal of the National Cancer Institute • 2013
PMID: 23613825.0
⚠ Moderate evidence exists, but dose is below effective threshold
This is a limiting factor: Dose is likely below clinically useful levels.
Scientific evidence
MacDonald et al. Cochrane review saw palmetto and benign prostatic hyperplasia
Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews • 2012
PMID: 24237566.0
Evidence inferred from established knowledge, not directly linked studies
Solid but not a standout: Clinical dosing guidance is limited for this ingredient.
No supporting studies or dosing references are currently available for this ingredient.
Important label or formulation details that may affect how this product should be interpreted.
Formula design looks less coherent than stronger alternatives
The formulation appears less focused than better-built options.
Maca dose looks below clinically effective levels
Declared amount falls below ranges used in human trials.
Ginseng dose looks below clinically effective levels
Declared amount falls below ranges used in human trials.
Read our methodology overview to understand how SuppScoreLab combines multiple scientific dimensions into one practical score.
View methodology →This evaluation is based on the product label and declared Supplement Facts available at review time. It does not verify laboratory-tested composition, purity, or batch-level quality. This content is educational and not medical advice. Consult a qualified healthcare professional for personal health decisions. Affiliate disclosure: SuppScoreLab may earn a commission from qualifying Amazon links.
See the best Berberine supplements ranked with the same methodology, or keep exploring the database.
