EVIDENCE-BASED SUPPLEMENT SCORING
6.1/10
AVERAGE

Confidence: 100%

THORNE - Daily Electrolytes - Zero Sugar & Low-Calorie Electrolyte Powder Drink Mix - Flavors Derived from Natural Sources - NSF Certified for Sport - Variety - 30 Stick Packs

THORNE - Daily Electrolytes - Zero Sugar & Low-Calorie Electrolyte Powder Drink Mix - Flavors Derived from Natural Sources - NSF Certified for Sport - Variety - 30 Stick Packs

B0DVXD2WBB

View on Amazon →

Decision summary

CONSIDERAVERAGE

A middling option. It may be usable, but weaker formulation coherence makes better alternatives worth comparing.

Best for

Buyers comparing price and availability and okay with a middle-of-the-pack option.

Consider another option if

You want one of the best-absorbed options in this category.

Score breakdown

Tap a module to see what it measures. A 0 can reflect missing disclosure, not just a negative result.

Dosage quality

0.7/10

Dosing looks weaker than ideal

Checks whether labeled ingredient amounts fall within clinically studied ranges (not just regulatory minimums). Low/0 can reflect under-dosing or missing amounts (e.g., proprietary blends).

Score summary

Potassium: high-bioavailability form declared (Potassium Citrate). The main limitation is that magnesium: below clinically studied range.

Strengths

Potassium: high-bioavailability form declared (Potassium Citrate)

Weaknesses

Magnesium: below clinically studied range
Formula coherence is weak: diluted, decorative or overly complex
Calcium: below clinically studied range

Final verdict

A middling option. It may be usable, but weaker formulation coherence makes better alternatives worth comparing.

Ingredient Analysis & Evidence

A closer look at the main ingredients, how they influence the score, and the supporting evidence when available. Tap any ingredient to expand.

⚠ Strong evidence exists, but dose is below effective threshold

One of the weaker points: Dose is likely below clinically useful levels. The declared form supports strong absorption.

Scientific evidence

Systematic review

Boyle et al. systematic review magnesium and subjective anxiety

Nutrients • 2017

PMID: 28145455.0

Meta-analysis

Dong et al. meta-analysis magnesium intake and type 2 diabetes risk

Diabetes Care • 2011

PMID: 21868780.0

⚠ Dose is below commonly used clinical ranges

This is a limiting factor: Dose is likely below clinically useful levels. The declared form supports strong absorption.

Clinical dosing guidance

Based on established dosing ranges used in clinical practice.

Min effective: 1500 mgOptimal: 2600 mgUpper: 5000 mgGrade: A

⚠ Strong evidence exists, but dose is below effective threshold

A clear drag on the formula: Dose is likely below clinically useful levels. The declared form supports strong absorption.

Scientific evidence

Meta-analysis

Tang et al. meta-analysis calcium supplementation and fracture risk

BMJ • 2007

PMID: 17720017.0

Evidence inferred from established knowledge, not directly linked studies

Supports the formula, but not a major driver: Clinical dosing guidance is limited for this ingredient.

No supporting studies or dosing references are currently available for this ingredient.

THORNE - Daily Electrolytes - Zero Sugar & Low-Calorie Electrolyte Powder Drink Mix - Flavors Derived from Natural Sources - NSF Certified for Sport - Variety - 30 Stick Packs

THORNE - Daily Electrolytes - Zero Sugar & Low-Calorie Electrolyte Powder Drink Mix - Flavors Derived from Natural Sources - NSF Certified for Sport - Variety - 30 Stick Packs

Warnings & notes

Important label or formulation details that may affect how this product should be interpreted.

!

Magnesium dose looks below clinically effective levels

Declared amount falls below ranges used in human trials.

Warning

Formula design looks less coherent than stronger alternatives

The formulation appears less focused than better-built options.

Note
!

Calcium dose looks below clinically effective levels

Declared amount falls below ranges used in human trials.

Warning

Methodology

Read our methodology overview to understand how SuppScoreLab combines multiple scientific dimensions into one practical score.

View methodology →

This evaluation is based on the product label and declared Supplement Facts available at review time. It does not verify laboratory-tested composition, purity, or batch-level quality. This content is educational and not medical advice. Consult a qualified healthcare professional for personal health decisions. Affiliate disclosure: SuppScoreLab may earn a commission from qualifying Amazon links.

Still comparing options?

See the best Potassium supplements ranked with the same methodology, or keep exploring the database.