Confidence: 63%
B0G6JBS2S6
View on Amazon →Decision summary
Not a strong option overall. The product is materially held back by weaker formulation coherence.
Best for
Buyers comparing price and availability and okay with a middle-of-the-pack option.
Consider another option if
You care a lot about ingredient quality and effectiveness.
Score breakdown
Tap a module to see what it measures. A 0 can reflect missing disclosure, not just a negative result.
Dosage quality
6.5/10Acceptable dosing, but not standout
Checks whether labeled ingredient amounts fall within clinically studied ranges (not just regulatory minimums). Low/0 can reflect under-dosing or missing amounts (e.g., proprietary blends).
Dose 6.5/10 · Bioavailability 0.3/10 · Coherence 0/10
Ingredient form quality suggests suboptimal ingredient forms.
This is a multi-ingredient product. The score reflects formulation quality, not efficacy for a specific health goal.
Iodine: dose within clinically studied range (evidence A). The main limitation is that formula coherence is weak: diluted, decorative or overly complex.
Strengths
Weaknesses
Final verdict
Not a strong option overall. The product is materially held back by weaker formulation coherence.
A closer look at the main ingredients, how they influence the score, and the supporting evidence when available. Tap any ingredient to expand.
✔ Clinically effective dose with strong supporting evidence
Dose is well positioned: Dose is strong and within effective ranges.
Scientific evidence
Zimmermann et al. review on iodine deficiency and thyroid function in human populations
Endocrine Reviews • 2009
PMID: 19357404.0
Bath et al. maternal iodine status and offspring cognitive outcomes (ALSPAC cohort)
Lancet • 2013
PMID: 23683674.0
✔ Clinically effective dose with moderate supporting evidence
Strong contributor: Dose is strong and within effective ranges. The declared form is acceptable, but not among the best-absorbed options.
Scientific evidence
Clarke et al. meta-analysis B vitamins and cognitive decline
American Journal of Clinical Nutrition • 2007
PMID: 22243457.0
Shipton & Thachil review of vitamin B12 deficiency and fatigue
Postgraduate Medical Journal • 2015
PMID: 20648714.0
ℹ Dose is within established clinical ranges, but lacks direct studies
A clear strength: Dose is strong and within effective ranges.
Clinical dosing guidance
Based on established dosing ranges used in clinical practice.
ℹ Dose is within established clinical ranges, but lacks direct studies
One of the weaker points: Dose is strong and within effective ranges. The label does not specify the form, so absorption quality cannot be verified.
Clinical dosing guidance
Based on established dosing ranges used in clinical practice.
✔ Clinically effective dose with moderate supporting evidence
Solid but not a standout: Dose is directionally useful, but not a standout strength.
Scientific evidence
Bryan et al. RCT on B vitamins and cognitive function in older adults
American Journal of Clinical Nutrition • 2002
PMID: 16920179.0
✔ Clinically effective dose with strong supporting evidence
A clear drag on the formula: Dose is strong and within effective ranges. The label does not specify the form, so absorption quality cannot be verified.
Scientific evidence
Cockayne et al. meta-analysis vitamin K2 and bone mineral density
Archives of Internal Medicine • 2006
PMID: 16801507.0
Geleijnse et al. Rotterdam study on vitamin K intake and cardiovascular mortality
Journal of Nutrition • 2004
PMID: 15514282.0
Important label or formulation details that may affect how this product should be interpreted.
Formula design looks less coherent than stronger alternatives
The formulation appears less focused than better-built options.
Vitamin A dose looks below clinically effective levels
Declared amount falls below ranges used in human trials.
Vitamin C dose looks below clinically effective levels
Declared amount falls below ranges used in human trials.
Read our methodology overview to understand how SuppScoreLab combines multiple scientific dimensions into one practical score.
View methodology →This evaluation is based on the product label and declared Supplement Facts available at review time. It does not verify laboratory-tested composition, purity, or batch-level quality. This content is educational and not medical advice. Consult a qualified healthcare professional for personal health decisions. Affiliate disclosure: SuppScoreLab may earn a commission from qualifying Amazon links.
See the best CoQ10 supplements ranked with the same methodology, or keep exploring the database.
