Confidence: 100%
B0FMKBDDYC
View on Amazon →Decision summary
A middling option. It may be usable, but weaker ingredient form quality makes better alternatives worth comparing.
Best for
People prioritizing high absorption and overall formula quality.
Consider another option if
You care a lot about label clarity and want fewer unknowns.
Score breakdown
Tap a module to see what it measures. A 0 can reflect missing disclosure, not just a negative result.
Dosage quality
7.5/10Generally solid dosing
Checks whether labeled ingredient amounts fall within clinically studied ranges (not just regulatory minimums). Low/0 can reflect under-dosing or missing amounts (e.g., proprietary blends).
The formula stays relatively clean on excipients. The main limitation is that trimethylglycine: below clinically studied range.
Strengths
Weaknesses
Final verdict
A middling option. It may be usable, but weaker ingredient form quality makes better alternatives worth comparing.
A closer look at the main ingredients, how they influence the score, and the supporting evidence when available. Tap any ingredient to expand.
ℹ Dose is below the optimal range with moderate supporting evidence
One of the weaker points: Dose is strong and within effective ranges. The declared form is not one of the better-absorbed options.
Scientific evidence
Liu et al. meta-analysis resveratrol and cardiovascular risk factors
American Journal of Clinical Nutrition • 2014
PMID: 26947365.0
ℹ Evidence is strong, but dose is below the optimal range
This is a limiting factor: Dose is below the ranges usually used for stronger effects. The declared form is acceptable, but not among the best-absorbed options.
Scientific evidence
Mortensen et al. Q-SYMBIO trial CoQ10 and heart failure outcomes
JACC: Heart Failure • 2014
PMID: 23221577.0
Mizuno et al. RCT CoQ10 and fatigue
Nutrition • 2008
PMID: 18272900.0
⚠ Moderate evidence exists, but dose is below effective threshold
This is a limiting factor: Dose is likely below clinically useful levels.
Scientific evidence
Schwab et al. RCT betaine supplementation and homocysteine
American Journal of Clinical Nutrition • 2002
PMID: 15649952.0
Evidence inferred from established knowledge, not directly linked studies
Supports the formula, but not a major driver: Clinical dosing guidance is limited for this ingredient.
No supporting studies or dosing references are currently available for this ingredient.
Important label or formulation details that may affect how this product should be interpreted.
Trimethylglycine dose looks below clinically effective levels
Declared amount falls below ranges used in human trials.
Read our methodology overview to understand how SuppScoreLab combines multiple scientific dimensions into one practical score.
View methodology →This evaluation is based on the product label and declared Supplement Facts available at review time. It does not verify laboratory-tested composition, purity, or batch-level quality. This content is educational and not medical advice. Consult a qualified healthcare professional for personal health decisions. Affiliate disclosure: SuppScoreLab may earn a commission from qualifying Amazon links.
See the best CoQ10 supplements ranked with the same methodology, or keep exploring the database.
