Confidence: 70%
B07S76M4D5
View on Amazon →SuppScoreLab compares supplement products for informational purposes. We do not sell products directly, and some links may take you to third-party retailers.
Decision summary
A strong option overall. Its main value comes from excipient quality, but the listed weaknesses are still worth checking…
Best for
People looking for a strong all-around option with minimal compromises.
Consider another option if
You care a lot about label clarity and want fewer unknowns.
Score breakdown
Tap a module to see what it measures. A 0 can reflect missing disclosure, not just a negative result.
Dosage quality
8.7/10Strong dosing for the intended goal
Checks whether labeled ingredient amounts fall within clinically studied ranges (not just regulatory minimums). Low/0 can reflect under-dosing or missing amounts (e.g., proprietary blends).
Explore next
Black-pepper: dose within clinically studied range (evidence B). The main limitation is that ashwagandha: standardization missing — withanolides — expected standardization: 5.0 % (-2).
Strengths
Weaknesses
Final verdict
A strong option overall. Its main value comes from excipient quality, but the listed weaknesses are still worth checking before buying.
A closer look at the main ingredients, how they influence the score, and the supporting evidence when available. Tap any ingredient to expand.
ℹ Dose is within established clinical ranges, but lacks direct studies
Dose is within the optimal/effective range. Strong contributor: Dose is strong and within effective ranges. The declared form is acceptable, but not among the best-absorbed options.
Clinical dosing guidance
Based on established dosing ranges used in clinical practice.
✔ Clinically effective dose with strong supporting evidence
Dose is within the optimal/effective range. Solid but not a standout: Dose is directionally useful, but not a standout strength. The declared form is acceptable, but not among the best-absorbed options.
Scientific evidence
Wankhede et al. RCT ashwagandha and testosterone levels
American Journal of Men's Health • 2015
PMID: 31991540.0
Chandrasekhar et al. RCT ashwagandha and cortisol in stressed adults
Indian Journal of Psychological Medicine • 2012
PMID: 23439798.0
Important label or formulation details that may affect how this product should be interpreted.
Some label details are missing or unclear
Incomplete disclosure makes the product harder to evaluate confidently.
There is a formulation caveat worth noting
Product name or brand not detected (-1)
Read our methodology overview to understand how SuppScoreLab combines multiple scientific dimensions into one practical score.
View methodology →This evaluation is based on the product label and declared Supplement Facts available at review time. It does not verify laboratory-tested composition, purity, or batch-level quality. This content is educational and not medical advice. Consult a qualified healthcare professional for personal health decisions. Affiliate disclosure: SuppScoreLab may earn a commission from qualifying Amazon links.
See the best Ashwagandha supplements ranked with the same methodology, or keep exploring the database.
