✔ Clinically effective dose with strong supporting evidence
Dose is within the optimal/effective range.
Scientific evidence
Tang et al. meta-analysis protein supplementation and muscle mass gain
British Journal of Nutrition • 2009
PMID: 22150425.0
Confidence: 80%

B0FG924FGR
View on Amazon →SuppScoreLab compares supplement products for informational purposes. We do not sell products directly, and some links may take you to third-party retailers.
Decision summary
A strong option overall. Its main value comes from excipient quality, but the listed weaknesses are still worth checking…
Best for
People prioritizing high absorption and overall formula quality.
Consider another option if
You need a very specific optimization beyond what the current scoring output captures.
Score breakdown
Tap a module to see what it measures. A 0 can reflect missing disclosure, not just a negative result.
Dosage quality
7.8/10Generally solid dosing
Checks whether labeled ingredient amounts fall within clinically studied ranges (not just regulatory minimums). Low/0 can reflect under-dosing or missing amounts (e.g., proprietary blends).
Explore next
Dose 7.8/10 · Bioavailability 5.3/10 · Coherence 0/10
This is a multi-ingredient product. The score reflects formulation quality, not efficacy for a specific health goal.
Whey-protein: dose within clinically studied range (evidence A). The main limitation is that critical safety flag limits final score.
Strengths
Weaknesses
Final verdict
A strong option overall. Its main value comes from excipient quality, but the listed weaknesses are still worth checking before buying.
A closer look at the main ingredients, how they influence the score, and the supporting evidence when available. Tap any ingredient to expand.
✔ Clinically effective dose with strong supporting evidence
Dose is within the optimal/effective range.
Scientific evidence
Tang et al. meta-analysis protein supplementation and muscle mass gain
British Journal of Nutrition • 2009
PMID: 22150425.0
✔ Clinically effective dose with moderate supporting evidence
Dose is within the optimal/effective range. Solid but not a standout: Dose is directionally useful, but not a standout strength. The declared form supports strong absorption.
Scientific evidence
Norton & Layman review leucine and mTOR activation in protein synthesis
Journal of Nutrition • 2006
PMID: 16365087.0
⚠ Evidence exists, but dose is above the upper dose range
Dose is above the upper dose range. One of the weaker points: Dose is higher than typically recommended ranges. The declared form supports strong absorption.
Clinical dosing guidance
Based on established dosing ranges used in clinical practice.
ℹ Dose is within established clinical ranges, but lacks direct studies
Dose is within the optimal/effective range.
Clinical dosing guidance
Based on established dosing ranges used in clinical practice.
⚠ Moderate evidence exists, but dose is above the upper dose range
Dose is above the upper dose range. A clear drag on the formula: Dose is higher than typically recommended ranges. The declared form supports strong absorption.
Scientific evidence
Jongkees et al. meta-analysis tyrosine and cognitive performance under stress
Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews • 2015
PMID: 25797858.0
Banderet & Lieberman RCT tyrosine and cognitive performance under stress
Brain Research Bulletin • 1989
PMID: 2736402.0
Evidence inferred from established knowledge, not directly linked studies
Adequate, but not a key strength: Clinical dosing guidance is limited for this ingredient. The declared form supports strong absorption.
No supporting studies or dosing references are currently available for this ingredient.

Important label or formulation details that may affect how this product should be interpreted.
Safety-related concerns may affect suitability
This product may deserve extra caution depending on context.
Formula design looks less coherent than stronger alternatives
The formulation appears less focused than better-built options.
Read our methodology overview to understand how SuppScoreLab combines multiple scientific dimensions into one practical score.
View methodology →This evaluation is based on the product label and declared Supplement Facts available at review time. It does not verify laboratory-tested composition, purity, or batch-level quality. This content is educational and not medical advice. Consult a qualified healthcare professional for personal health decisions. Affiliate disclosure: SuppScoreLab may earn a commission from qualifying Amazon links.
See the best Protein Powder supplements ranked with the same methodology, or keep exploring the database.