SuppScoreLab compares supplement products for informational purposes. We do not sell products directly, and some links may take you to third-party retailers.
Decision summary
SKIPWEAK
Not a strong option overall. The product is materially held back by weaker ingredient form quality.
Only budget-focused buyers with flexible standards.
Consider another option if
You care a lot about label clarity and want fewer unknowns.
Score breakdown
Tap a module to see what it measures. A 0 can reflect missing disclosure, not just a negative result.
Dosage quality
7.4/10
Generally solid dosing
Checks whether labeled ingredient amounts fall within clinically studied ranges (not just regulatory minimums). Low/0 can reflect under-dosing or missing amounts (e.g., proprietary blends).
Zinc: dose within clinically studied range (evidence A). The main limitation is that zinc: chemical form not specified on label.
Strengths
Zinc: dose within clinically studied range (evidence A)
Weaknesses
Zinc: chemical form not specified on label
Formula coherence is weak: diluted, decorative or overly complex
Iron: below clinically studied range
Final verdict
Not a strong option overall. The product is materially held back by weaker ingredient form quality.
Ingredient Analysis & Evidence
A closer look at the main ingredients, how they influence the score, and the supporting evidence when available. Tap any ingredient to expand.
✔ Clinically effective dose with strong supporting evidence
Dose is within the optimal/effective range. This is a limiting factor: Dose is strong and within effective ranges. The label does not specify the form, so absorption quality cannot be verified.
ℹ At the minimum effective range, but below the optimal dose; evidence is strong
Dose meets the minimum effective range, but is below the optimal dose used for stronger effects. A clear drag on the formula: Dose is below the ranges usually used for stronger effects. The label does not specify the form, so absorption quality cannot be verified.
Scientific evidence
Meta-analysis
Tang et al. meta-analysis calcium supplementation and fracture risk
⚠ Strong evidence exists, but dose is below effective threshold
Dose is below the minimum effective threshold. One of the weaker points: Dose is likely below clinically useful levels. The label does not specify the form, so absorption quality cannot be verified.
Scientific evidence
Systematic review
Boyle et al. systematic review magnesium and subjective anxiety
Dose is below the minimum effective threshold. This is a limiting factor: Dose is likely below clinically useful levels. The label does not specify the form, so absorption quality cannot be verified.
Clinical dosing guidance
Based on established dosing ranges used in clinical practice.
Min effective: 1500 mgOptimal: 2600 mgUpper: 5000 mgGrade: A
⚠ Moderate evidence exists, but dose is below effective threshold
Dose is below the minimum effective threshold. A clear drag on the formula: Dose is likely below clinically useful levels. The label does not specify the form, so absorption quality cannot be verified.
Scientific evidence
Meta-analysis
Pasricha et al. systematic review iron and fatigue in non-anaemic women
This evaluation is based on the product label and declared Supplement Facts available at review time. It does not verify laboratory-tested composition, purity, or batch-level quality. This content is educational and not medical advice. Consult a qualified healthcare professional for personal health decisions. Affiliate disclosure: SuppScoreLab may earn a commission from qualifying Amazon links.
Still comparing options?
See the best Protein Powder supplements ranked with the same methodology, or keep exploring the database.
