Decision summary

CONSIDERAVERAGE

A middling option. It may be usable, but weaker formulation coherence makes better alternatives worth comparing.

Compare top Protein Powder picks

Best for

Buyers comparing price and availability and okay with a middle-of-the-pack option.

Consider another option if

You prefer fully transparent formulas over blends and ambiguous labeling.

Multi-ingredient formulation analysis

Dose 4.9/10 · Bioavailability 5.5/10 · Coherence 0/10

Dose quality suggests a diluted formulation.

A proprietary blend limits independent dose verification.

This is a multi-ingredient product. The score reflects formulation quality, not efficacy for a specific health goal.

Score summary

Vitamin-k: dose within clinically studied range (evidence B). The main limitation is that proprietary blend prevents independent dose verification.

Strengths

Vitamin-k: dose within clinically studied range (evidence B)

Vitamin-b5: dose within clinically studied range (evidence B)

Magnesium: dose within clinically studied range (evidence A)

Weaknesses

Proprietary blend prevents independent dose verification

Formula coherence is weak: diluted, decorative or overly complex

Vitamin-d: below clinically studied range

Final verdict

A middling option. It may be usable, but weaker formulation coherence makes better alternatives worth comparing.

Ingredient Analysis & Evidence

A closer look at the main ingredients, how they influence the score, and the supporting evidence when available. Tap any ingredient to expand.

⚠ Strong evidence exists, but dose is above the upper dose range

Dose is above the upper dose range. This is a limiting factor: Dose is higher than typically recommended ranges. The declared form is acceptable, but not among the best-absorbed options.

Scientific evidence

Meta-analysis

Hemila & Chalker Cochrane review vitamin C and common cold duration

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews • 2013

PMID: 23440782.0

RCT

Padayatty et al. RCT on vitamin C antioxidant capacity in healthy adults

Journal of the American College of Nutrition • 2001

PMID: 11684527.0

ℹ Dose is within established clinical ranges, but lacks direct studies

Dose is within the optimal/effective range. Strong contributor: Dose is strong and within effective ranges. The declared form supports strong absorption.

Clinical dosing guidance

Based on established dosing ranges used in clinical practice.

Min effective: 75 mcgOptimal: 120 mcgUpper: 1000 mcgGrade: B

✔ Clinically effective dose with strong supporting evidence

Dose is within the optimal/effective range. Strong contributor: Dose is strong and within effective ranges. The declared form supports strong absorption.

Scientific evidence

Systematic review

Boyle et al. systematic review magnesium and subjective anxiety

Nutrients • 2017

PMID: 28145455.0

Meta-analysis

Dong et al. meta-analysis magnesium intake and type 2 diabetes risk

Diabetes Care • 2011

PMID: 21868780.0

ℹ Dose is within established clinical ranges, but lacks direct studies

Dose is within the optimal/effective range. Supports the formula, but not a major driver: Dose is directionally useful, but not a standout strength. The declared form supports strong absorption.

Clinical dosing guidance

Based on established dosing ranges used in clinical practice.

Min effective: 700 mcgOptimal: 900 mcgUpper: 3000 mcgGrade: A

ℹ At the minimum effective range, but below the optimal dose with moderate supporting evidence

Dose meets the minimum effective range, but is below the optimal dose used for stronger effects. A clear drag on the formula: Dose is below the ranges usually used for stronger effects. The declared form is acceptable, but not among the best-absorbed options.

Scientific evidence

RCT

Broome et al. RCT selenium and immune function

American Journal of Clinical Nutrition • 2004

PMID: 14657398.0

RCT

Clark et al. RCT selenium supplementation and cancer prevention

JAMA • 1996

PMID: 8629283.0

ℹ Dose is within established clinical ranges, but lacks direct studies

Dose meets the minimum effective range, but is below the optimal dose used for stronger effects. This is a limiting factor: Dose is below the ranges usually used for stronger effects. The declared form supports strong absorption.

Clinical dosing guidance

Based on established dosing ranges used in clinical practice.

Min effective: 0.9 mgOptimal: 1.5 mgUpper: 10 mgGrade: B

Nourify Plus Plant-Based Protein Shake - All Natural Vegan Protein Powder, High Protein & Low Sugar, Gluten Free, Soy Free & Dairy Free, Chocolate Protein Powder (29.3 oz)

6.5/10

View on Amazon →

Warnings & notes

Important label or formulation details that may affect how this product should be interpreted.

i

Proprietary blend limits dose transparency

Exact ingredient amounts cannot be verified clearly.

Info

⚠

Formula design looks less coherent than stronger alternatives

The formulation appears less focused than better-built options.

Note

!

Vitamin D dose looks below clinically effective levels

Declared amount falls below ranges used in human trials.

Warning

Methodology

Read our methodology overview to understand how SuppScoreLab combines multiple scientific dimensions into one practical score.

View methodology →

This evaluation is based on the product label and declared Supplement Facts available at review time. It does not verify laboratory-tested composition, purity, or batch-level quality. This content is educational and not medical advice. Consult a qualified healthcare professional for personal health decisions. Affiliate disclosure: SuppScoreLab may earn a commission from qualifying Amazon links.

Still comparing options?

See the best Protein Powder supplements ranked with the same methodology, or keep exploring the database.

See best Protein Powder supplements Browse database