EVIDENCE-BASED SUPPLEMENT SCORING
4.5/10
WEAK

Confidence: 44%

New Chapter Women’s Multivitamin 55+, Astaxanthin, B6, B12, D3, Vitamin C & Zinc, Immune, Heart, Cellular Energy, and Bone Support, Gentle on The Stomach, One Daily, Non-GMO, Gluten-Free, 96 Tablets

New Chapter Women’s Multivitamin 55+, Astaxanthin, B6, B12, D3, Vitamin C & Zinc, Immune, Heart, Cellular Energy, and Bone Support, Gentle on The Stomach, One Daily, Non-GMO, Gluten-Free

B07FJC7ZWJ

View on Amazon →

Decision summary

SKIPWEAK

Not a strong option overall. The product is materially held back by weaker formulation coherence.

Best for

Only budget-focused buyers with flexible standards.

Consider another option if

You care a lot about label clarity and want fewer unknowns.

Score breakdown

Tap a module to see what it measures. A 0 can reflect missing disclosure, not just a negative result.

Dosage quality

2.8/10

Dosing looks weaker than ideal

Checks whether labeled ingredient amounts fall within clinically studied ranges (not just regulatory minimums). Low/0 can reflect under-dosing or missing amounts (e.g., proprietary blends).

Multi-ingredient formulation analysis

Dose 2.8/10 · Bioavailability 1.3/10 · Coherence 0/10

Dose quality suggests a diluted formulation.

Ingredient form quality suggests suboptimal ingredient forms.

A proprietary blend limits independent dose verification.

Some ingredient forms are not declared on the label.

This is a multi-ingredient product. The score reflects formulation quality, not efficacy for a specific health goal.

Score summary

Vitamin-k: dose within clinically studied range (evidence B). The main limitation is that proprietary blend prevents independent dose verification.

Strengths

Vitamin-k: dose within clinically studied range (evidence B)
Vitamin-d: high-bioavailability form declared (Cholecalciferol (D3))

Weaknesses

Proprietary blend prevents independent dose verification
Vitamin-c: below clinically studied range
Zinc: chemical form not specified on label

Final verdict

Not a strong option overall. The product is materially held back by weaker formulation coherence.

Ingredient Analysis & Evidence

A closer look at the main ingredients, how they influence the score, and the supporting evidence when available. Tap any ingredient to expand.

⚠ Strong evidence exists, but dose is below effective threshold

This is a limiting factor: Dose is likely below clinically useful levels. The declared form is acceptable, but not among the best-absorbed options.

Scientific evidence

Meta-analysis

Hemila & Chalker Cochrane review vitamin C and common cold duration

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews • 2013

PMID: 23440782.0

RCT

Padayatty et al. RCT on vitamin C antioxidant capacity in healthy adults

Journal of the American College of Nutrition • 2001

PMID: 11684527.0

ℹ Evidence is strong, but dose is below the optimal range

This is a limiting factor: Dose is below the ranges usually used for stronger effects. The label does not specify the form, so absorption quality cannot be verified.

Scientific evidence

Meta-analysis

Singh & Das Cochrane review zinc for common cold

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews • 2011

PMID: 22553186.0

RCT

Prasad et al. RCT zinc supplementation and testosterone in elderly men

Nutrition • 1996

PMID: 8875519.0

ℹ Dose is within established clinical ranges, but lacks direct studies

One of the weaker points: Dose is strong and within effective ranges. The label does not specify the form, so absorption quality cannot be verified.

Clinical dosing guidance

Based on established dosing ranges used in clinical practice.

Min effective: 75 mcgOptimal: 120 mcgUpper: 1000 mcgGrade: B

ℹ Dose is within established clinical ranges, but lacks direct studies

This is a limiting factor: Dose is below the ranges usually used for stronger effects.

Clinical dosing guidance

Based on established dosing ranges used in clinical practice.

Min effective: 1 mgOptimal: 5 mgUpper: 100 mgGrade: B

ℹ Dose is below the optimal range and supported by limited evidence

A clear drag on the formula: Dose is below the ranges usually used for stronger effects.

Scientific evidence

narrative_review

Hodges et al. review on pantothenic acid physiology and human deficiency implications

Advances in Nutrition • 2020

ℹ Evidence is strong, but dose is below the optimal range

A clear drag on the formula: Dose is below the ranges usually used for stronger effects.

Scientific evidence

Systematic review

Zimmermann et al. review on iodine deficiency and thyroid function in human populations

Endocrine Reviews • 2009

PMID: 19357404.0

Cohort

Bath et al. maternal iodine status and offspring cognitive outcomes (ALSPAC cohort)

Lancet • 2013

PMID: 23683674.0

New Chapter Women’s Multivitamin 55+, Astaxanthin, B6, B12, D3, Vitamin C & Zinc, Immune, Heart, Cellular Energy, and Bone Support, Gentle on The Stomach, One Daily, Non-GMO, Gluten-Free, 96 Tablets

New Chapter Women’s Multivitamin 55+, Astaxanthin, B6, B12, D3, Vitamin C & Zinc, Immune, Heart, Cellular Energy, and Bone Support, Gentle on The Stomach, One Daily, Non-GMO, Gluten-Free, 96 Tablets

Warnings & notes

Important label or formulation details that may affect how this product should be interpreted.

i

Proprietary blend limits dose transparency

Exact ingredient amounts cannot be verified clearly.

Info
!

Vitamin C dose looks below clinically effective levels

Declared amount falls below ranges used in human trials.

Warning
i

Zinc form is not clearly declared

Exact ingredient form is not disclosed on the label.

Info

Methodology

Read our methodology overview to understand how SuppScoreLab combines multiple scientific dimensions into one practical score.

View methodology →

This evaluation is based on the product label and declared Supplement Facts available at review time. It does not verify laboratory-tested composition, purity, or batch-level quality. This content is educational and not medical advice. Consult a qualified healthcare professional for personal health decisions. Affiliate disclosure: SuppScoreLab may earn a commission from qualifying Amazon links.

Still comparing options?

See the best Zinc supplements ranked with the same methodology, or keep exploring the database.