ℹ Clinically effective dose, but evidence is limited
Dose is within the optimal/effective range.
Scientific evidence
narrative_review
Hodges et al. review on pantothenic acid physiology and human deficiency implications
Advances in Nutrition • 2020
EVIDENCE-BASED SUPPLEMENT SCORING
6.5/10
AVERAGEConfidence: 70%
Nature Made Multivitamin for Him, Mens Multivitamins with No Iron, Daily Nutritional Support, Nature Made Multi Mens Vitamins & Minerals
B005BD8A08
View on Amazon →SuppScoreLab compares supplement products for informational purposes. We do not sell products directly, and some links may take you to third-party retailers.
Decision summary
CONSIDERAVERAGE
A middling option. It may be usable, but weaker formulation coherence makes better alternatives worth comparing.
Best for
Buyers comparing price and availability and okay with a middle-of-the-pack option.
Consider another option if
You care a lot about ingredient quality and effectiveness.
Score breakdown
Tap a module to see what it measures. A 0 can reflect missing disclosure, not just a negative result.
Dosage quality
6.4/10Acceptable dosing, but not standout
Checks whether labeled ingredient amounts fall within clinically studied ranges (not just regulatory minimums). Low/0 can reflect under-dosing or missing amounts (e.g., proprietary blends).
Multi-ingredient formulation analysis
Dose 6.4/10 · Bioavailability 3.2/10 · Coherence 0/10
Ingredient form quality suggests suboptimal ingredient forms.
This is a multi-ingredient product. The score reflects formulation quality, not efficacy for a specific health goal.
Score summary
Vitamin-b5: dose within clinically studied range (evidence B). The main limitation is that formula coherence is weak: diluted, decorative or overly complex.
Strengths
Vitamin-b5: dose within clinically studied range (evidence B)
Iodine: dose within clinically studied range (evidence A)
Zinc: dose within clinically studied range (evidence A)
Weaknesses
Formula coherence is weak: diluted, decorative or overly complex
Vitamin-d: below clinically studied range
Vitamin-e: below clinically studied range
Final verdict
A middling option. It may be usable, but weaker formulation coherence makes better alternatives worth comparing.
Ingredient Analysis & Evidence
A closer look at the main ingredients, how they influence the score, and the supporting evidence when available. Tap any ingredient to expand.
✔ Clinically effective dose with strong supporting evidence
Dose is within the optimal/effective range.
Scientific evidence
Systematic review
Zimmermann et al. review on iodine deficiency and thyroid function in human populations
Endocrine Reviews • 2009
PMID: 19357404.0
Cohort
Bath et al. maternal iodine status and offspring cognitive outcomes (ALSPAC cohort)
Lancet • 2013
PMID: 23683674.0
✔ Clinically effective dose with strong supporting evidence
Dose is within the optimal/effective range. This is a limiting factor: Dose is strong and within effective ranges. The declared form is not one of the better-absorbed options.
Scientific evidence
Meta-analysis
Singh & Das Cochrane review zinc for common cold
Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews • 2011
PMID: 22553186.0
RCT
Prasad et al. RCT zinc supplementation and testosterone in elderly men
Nutrition • 1996
PMID: 8875519.0
ℹ Dose is within established clinical ranges, but lacks direct studies
Dose meets the minimum effective range, but is below the optimal dose used for stronger effects. Adequate, but not a key strength: Dose is directionally useful, but not a standout strength. The declared form is acceptable, but not among the best-absorbed options.
Clinical dosing guidance
Based on established dosing ranges used in clinical practice.
Min effective: 1.8 mgOptimal: 2.5 mgUpper: 11 mgGrade: B
ℹ Dose is within established clinical ranges, but lacks direct studies
Dose meets the minimum effective range, but is below the optimal dose used for stronger effects. One of the weaker points: Dose is below the ranges usually used for stronger effects. The declared form supports strong absorption.
Clinical dosing guidance
Based on established dosing ranges used in clinical practice.
Min effective: 75 mcgOptimal: 120 mcgUpper: 1000 mcgGrade: B
ℹ Dose is within established clinical ranges, but lacks direct studies
Dose meets the minimum effective range, but is below the optimal dose used for stronger effects. A clear drag on the formula: Dose is below the ranges usually used for stronger effects. The declared form is acceptable, but not among the best-absorbed options.
Clinical dosing guidance
Based on established dosing ranges used in clinical practice.
Min effective: 700 mcgOptimal: 900 mcgUpper: 3000 mcgGrade: A
Nature Made Multivitamin for Him, Mens Multivitamins with No Iron, Daily Nutritional Support, Nature Made Multi Mens Vitamins & Minerals, 90 Tablets, 90 Day Supply
6.5/10
View on Amazon →Warnings & notes
Important label or formulation details that may affect how this product should be interpreted.
⚠
Formula design looks less coherent than stronger alternatives
The formulation appears less focused than better-built options.
!
Vitamin D dose looks below clinically effective levels
Declared amount falls below ranges used in human trials.
!
Vitamin E dose looks below clinically effective levels
Declared amount falls below ranges used in human trials.
Methodology
Read our methodology overview to understand how SuppScoreLab combines multiple scientific dimensions into one practical score.
View methodology →This evaluation is based on the product label and declared Supplement Facts available at review time. It does not verify laboratory-tested composition, purity, or batch-level quality. This content is educational and not medical advice. Consult a qualified healthcare professional for personal health decisions. Affiliate disclosure: SuppScoreLab may earn a commission from qualifying Amazon links.
Still comparing options?
Keep exploring the database to compare better-ranked supplements and ingredient guides.
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.