EVIDENCE-BASED SUPPLEMENT SCORING
6.2/10
AVERAGE

Confidence: 95%

Multi Collagen Peptides Gummies, Type I, II, III, V, X - Hydrolyzed Collagen Peptides with Biotin, Hyaluronic Acid, Supports Healthy Skin, Strong Nails & Thick Hair, 60 Count, 1 Pack

Multi Collagen Peptides Gummies, Type I, II, III, V, X - Hydrolyzed Collagen Peptides with Biotin, Hyaluronic Acid, Supports Healthy Skin, Strong Nails & Thick Hair, 1 Pack

B0DQNQS21Z

View on Amazon →

SuppScoreLab compares supplement products for informational purposes. We do not sell products directly, and some links may take you to third-party retailers.

Decision summary

CONSIDERAVERAGE

A middling option. It may be usable, but weaker formulation coherence makes better alternatives worth comparing.

Best for

Buyers comparing price and availability and okay with a middle-of-the-pack option.

Consider another option if

You prefer fully transparent formulas over blends and ambiguous labeling.

Score breakdown

Tap a module to see what it measures. A 0 can reflect missing disclosure, not just a negative result.

Dosage quality

4.6/10

Dosing looks weaker than ideal

Checks whether labeled ingredient amounts fall within clinically studied ranges (not just regulatory minimums). Low/0 can reflect under-dosing or missing amounts (e.g., proprietary blends).

Multi-ingredient formulation analysis

Dose 4.6/10 · Bioavailability 4.2/10 · Coherence 0/10

Dose quality suggests a diluted formulation.

Ingredient form quality suggests suboptimal ingredient forms.

A proprietary blend limits independent dose verification.

This is a multi-ingredient product. The score reflects formulation quality, not efficacy for a specific health goal.

Score summary

Vitamin-d: high-bioavailability form declared (Cholecalciferol (D3)). The main limitation is that proprietary blend prevents independent dose verification.

Strengths

Vitamin-d: high-bioavailability form declared (Cholecalciferol (D3))

Weaknesses

Proprietary blend prevents independent dose verification
Hyaluronic-acid: below clinically studied range
Formula coherence is weak: diluted, decorative or overly complex

Final verdict

A middling option. It may be usable, but weaker formulation coherence makes better alternatives worth comparing.

Ingredient Analysis & Evidence

A closer look at the main ingredients, how they influence the score, and the supporting evidence when available. Tap any ingredient to expand.

⚠ Moderate evidence exists, but dose is below effective threshold

Dose is below the minimum effective threshold. A clear drag on the formula: Dose is likely below clinically useful levels. The declared form is acceptable, but not among the best-absorbed options.

Scientific evidence

Meta-analysis

Zou et al. meta-analysis hyaluronic acid and knee osteoarthritis

PLOS ONE • 2014

PMID: 22424500.0

RCT

Oe et al. RCT oral hyaluronic acid and skin dryness and wrinkles

Nutrition Journal • 2017

PMID: 27224842.0

✔ Clinically effective dose with moderate supporting evidence

Dose is within the optimal/effective range. Strong contributor: Dose is strong and within effective ranges.

Scientific evidence

Systematic review

Patel et al. systematic review biotin and hair/nail health

Skin Appendage Disorders • 2017

PMID: 28786550.0

ℹ Dose is within established clinical ranges, but lacks direct studies

Dose meets the minimum effective range, but is below the optimal dose used for stronger effects. A clear drag on the formula: Dose is below the ranges usually used for stronger effects. The declared form supports strong absorption.

Clinical dosing guidance

Based on established dosing ranges used in clinical practice.

Min effective: 700 mcgOptimal: 900 mcgUpper: 3000 mcgGrade: A

ℹ At the minimum effective range, but below the optimal dose; evidence is strong

Dose meets the minimum effective range, but is below the optimal dose used for stronger effects. One of the weaker points: Dose is likely below clinically useful levels. The label does not specify the form, so absorption quality cannot be verified.

Scientific evidence

Meta-analysis

de Miranda et al. systematic review collagen peptides and skin

Journal of Cosmetic Dermatology • 2021

PMID: 31627309.0

RCT

Clark et al. RCT collagen hydrolysate and joint pain in athletes

Current Medical Research and Opinion • 2008

PMID: 19212965.0

⚠ Strong evidence exists, but dose may be too low to be effective

A clear drag on the formula: Dose is likely below clinically useful levels. The declared form supports strong absorption.

Scientific evidence

Meta-analysis

Martineau et al. meta-analysis vitamin D supplementation and respiratory infections

BMJ • 2017

PMID: 26864360.0

Meta-analysis

Bischoff-Ferrari et al. meta-analysis vitamin D fracture prevention

BMJ • 2009

PMID: 20198382.0

ℹ At the minimum effective range, but below the optimal dose with moderate supporting evidence

Dose meets the minimum effective range, but is below the optimal dose used for stronger effects. One of the weaker points: Dose is likely below clinically useful levels. The declared form is acceptable, but not among the best-absorbed options.

Scientific evidence

RCT

Bryan et al. RCT on B vitamins and cognitive function in older adults

American Journal of Clinical Nutrition • 2002

PMID: 16920179.0

Multi Collagen Peptides Gummies, Type I, II, III, V, X - Hydrolyzed Collagen Peptides with Biotin, Hyaluronic Acid, Supports Healthy Skin, Strong Nails & Thick Hair, 60 Count, 1 Pack

Multi Collagen Peptides Gummies, Type I, II, III, V, X - Hydrolyzed Collagen Peptides with Biotin, Hyaluronic Acid, Supports Healthy Skin, Strong Nails & Thick Hair, 60 Count, 1 Pack

Warnings & notes

Important label or formulation details that may affect how this product should be interpreted.

i

Proprietary blend limits dose transparency

Exact ingredient amounts cannot be verified clearly.

Info
!

Hyaluronic Acid dose looks below clinically effective levels

Declared amount falls below ranges used in human trials.

Warning

Formula design looks less coherent than stronger alternatives

The formulation appears less focused than better-built options.

Note

Methodology

Read our methodology overview to understand how SuppScoreLab combines multiple scientific dimensions into one practical score.

View methodology →

This evaluation is based on the product label and declared Supplement Facts available at review time. It does not verify laboratory-tested composition, purity, or batch-level quality. This content is educational and not medical advice. Consult a qualified healthcare professional for personal health decisions. Affiliate disclosure: SuppScoreLab may earn a commission from qualifying Amazon links.

Still comparing options?

See the best Collagen supplements ranked with the same methodology, or keep exploring the database.

As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.