Confidence: 100%
B0C2YCK25S
View on Amazon →Decision summary
A solid product, but not a clean win. The main trade-off is weaker dosing.
Best for
People prioritizing high absorption and overall formula quality.
Consider another option if
You want fewer compromises on formulation quality.
Score breakdown
Tap a module to see what it measures. A 0 can reflect missing disclosure, not just a negative result.
Dosage quality
5.1/10Acceptable dosing, but not standout
Checks whether labeled ingredient amounts fall within clinically studied ranges (not just regulatory minimums). Low/0 can reflect under-dosing or missing amounts (e.g., proprietary blends).
Explore next
Magnesium: high-bioavailability form declared (Magnesium Glycinate). The main limitation is that magnesium: dose 500.0mg exceeds upper_dose 420.0mg.
Strengths
Weaknesses
Final verdict
A solid product, but not a clean win. The main trade-off is weaker dosing.
A closer look at the main ingredients, how they influence the score, and the supporting evidence when available. Tap any ingredient to expand.
ℹ Dose is below the optimal range with moderate supporting evidence
This is a limiting factor: Dose is below the ranges usually used for stronger effects. The declared form supports strong absorption.
Scientific evidence
Owen et al. RCT theanine and caffeine on cognitive performance
Nutritional Neuroscience • 2008
PMID: 18681988.0
Lu et al. RCT L-theanine and stress response in healthy adults
Nutritional Neuroscience • 2004
PMID: 16930802.0
✔ Clinically effective dose with strong supporting evidence
One of the weaker points: Dose is below the ranges usually used for stronger effects. The declared form supports strong absorption.
Scientific evidence
Boyle et al. systematic review magnesium and subjective anxiety
Nutrients • 2017
PMID: 28145455.0
Dong et al. meta-analysis magnesium intake and type 2 diabetes risk
Diabetes Care • 2011
PMID: 21868780.0
✔ Clinically effective dose with moderate supporting evidence
Solid but not a standout: Dose is directionally useful, but not a standout strength.
Scientific evidence
Bryan et al. RCT on B vitamins and cognitive function in older adults
American Journal of Clinical Nutrition • 2002
PMID: 16920179.0
✔ Dose aligned with moderate supporting evidence
Adequate, but not a key strength: Clinical dosing guidance is limited for this ingredient.
Scientific evidence
Hieu et al. systematic review chamomile and sleep quality
Phytomedicine • 2019
PMID: 28214677.0
Evidence inferred from established knowledge, not directly linked studies
Adequate, but not a key strength: Clinical dosing guidance is limited for this ingredient.
No supporting studies or dosing references are currently available for this ingredient.
Important label or formulation details that may affect how this product should be interpreted.
Dose quality may be a limiting factor
Declared amount may be weaker than ideal for a stronger result.
There is a formulation caveat worth noting
Chamomile: no form data available — bio score = 0
Read our methodology overview to understand how SuppScoreLab combines multiple scientific dimensions into one practical score.
View methodology →This evaluation is based on the product label and declared Supplement Facts available at review time. It does not verify laboratory-tested composition, purity, or batch-level quality. This content is educational and not medical advice. Consult a qualified healthcare professional for personal health decisions. Affiliate disclosure: SuppScoreLab may earn a commission from qualifying Amazon links.
See the best Magnesium supplements ranked with the same methodology, or keep exploring the database.
