EVIDENCE-BASED SUPPLEMENT SCORING
7.0/10
SOLID OPTION

Confidence: 81%

Liquid I.V.® Hydration Multiplier +Immune Support - Mango Passionfruit | Electrolyte Powder Drink Mix | 1 Pack (14 Servings)

Liquid I.V.® Hydration Multiplier +Immune Support - Mango Passionfruit | Electrolyte Powder Drink Mix | 1 Pack (14 Servings)

B0CHN82CY8

View on Amazon →

Decision summary

CONSIDERSOLID OPTION

A middling option. It may be usable, but weaker formulation coherence makes better alternatives worth comparing.

Best for

People prioritizing high absorption and overall formula quality.

Consider another option if

You care a lot about label clarity and want fewer unknowns.

Score breakdown

Tap a module to see what it measures. A 0 can reflect missing disclosure, not just a negative result.

Dosage quality

8.5/10

Strong dosing for the intended goal

Checks whether labeled ingredient amounts fall within clinically studied ranges (not just regulatory minimums). Low/0 can reflect under-dosing or missing amounts (e.g., proprietary blends).

Multi-ingredient formulation analysis

Dose 8.5/10 · Bioavailability 2.6/10 · Coherence 0/10

Ingredient form quality suggests suboptimal ingredient forms.

Some ingredient forms are not declared on the label.

This is a multi-ingredient product. The score reflects formulation quality, not efficacy for a specific health goal.

Score summary

Vitamin-c: dose within clinically studied range (evidence A). The main limitation is that zinc: chemical form not specified on label.

Strengths

Vitamin-c: dose within clinically studied range (evidence A)
Zinc: dose within clinically studied range (evidence A)
Vitamin-b5: dose within clinically studied range (evidence B)

Weaknesses

Zinc: chemical form not specified on label
Formula coherence is weak: diluted, decorative or overly complex
Potassium: below clinically studied range

Final verdict

A middling option. It may be usable, but weaker formulation coherence makes better alternatives worth comparing.

Ingredient Analysis & Evidence

A closer look at the main ingredients, how they influence the score, and the supporting evidence when available. Tap any ingredient to expand.

✔ Clinically effective dose with strong supporting evidence

A clear strength: Dose is strong and within effective ranges. The declared form is acceptable, but not among the best-absorbed options.

Scientific evidence

Meta-analysis

Hemila & Chalker Cochrane review vitamin C and common cold duration

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews • 2013

PMID: 23440782.0

RCT

Padayatty et al. RCT on vitamin C antioxidant capacity in healthy adults

Journal of the American College of Nutrition • 2001

PMID: 11684527.0

ℹ Evidence is strong, but dose is below the optimal range

This is a limiting factor: Dose is strong and within effective ranges. The label does not specify the form, so absorption quality cannot be verified.

Scientific evidence

Meta-analysis

Singh & Das Cochrane review zinc for common cold

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews • 2011

PMID: 22553186.0

RCT

Prasad et al. RCT zinc supplementation and testosterone in elderly men

Nutrition • 1996

PMID: 8875519.0

ℹ Dose is below the optimal range and supported by limited evidence

Dose is well positioned: Dose is strong and within effective ranges.

Scientific evidence

narrative_review

Hodges et al. review on pantothenic acid physiology and human deficiency implications

Advances in Nutrition • 2020

ℹ Dose is within established clinical ranges, but lacks direct studies

One of the weaker points: Dose is likely below clinically useful levels. The declared form is acceptable, but not among the best-absorbed options.

Clinical dosing guidance

Based on established dosing ranges used in clinical practice.

Min effective: 15 mgOptimal: 500 mgUpper: 3000 mgGrade: A

ℹ Dose is below the optimal range with moderate supporting evidence

One of the weaker points: Dose is likely below clinically useful levels. The declared form is acceptable, but not among the best-absorbed options.

Scientific evidence

Meta-analysis

Clarke et al. meta-analysis B vitamins and cognitive decline

American Journal of Clinical Nutrition • 2007

PMID: 22243457.0

RCT

Shipton & Thachil review of vitamin B12 deficiency and fatigue

Postgraduate Medical Journal • 2015

PMID: 20648714.0

ℹ Dose is below the optimal range with moderate supporting evidence

One of the weaker points: Dose is likely below clinically useful levels.

Scientific evidence

RCT

Bryan et al. RCT on B vitamins and cognitive function in older adults

American Journal of Clinical Nutrition • 2002

PMID: 16920179.0

Liquid I.V.® Hydration Multiplier +Immune Support - Mango Passionfruit | Electrolyte Powder Drink Mix | 1 Pack (14 Servings)

Liquid I.V.® Hydration Multiplier +Immune Support - Mango Passionfruit | Electrolyte Powder Drink Mix | 1 Pack (14 Servings)

Warnings & notes

Important label or formulation details that may affect how this product should be interpreted.

i

Zinc form is not clearly declared

Exact ingredient form is not disclosed on the label.

Info

Formula design looks less coherent than stronger alternatives

The formulation appears less focused than better-built options.

Note
!

Potassium dose looks below clinically effective levels

Declared amount falls below ranges used in human trials.

Warning

Methodology

Read our methodology overview to understand how SuppScoreLab combines multiple scientific dimensions into one practical score.

View methodology →

This evaluation is based on the product label and declared Supplement Facts available at review time. It does not verify laboratory-tested composition, purity, or batch-level quality. This content is educational and not medical advice. Consult a qualified healthcare professional for personal health decisions. Affiliate disclosure: SuppScoreLab may earn a commission from qualifying Amazon links.

Still comparing options?

See the best Potassium supplements ranked with the same methodology, or keep exploring the database.