Confidence: 63%
B099LMHRN3
View on Amazon →SuppScoreLab compares supplement products for informational purposes. We do not sell products directly, and some links may take you to third-party retailers.
Decision summary
Not a strong option overall. The product is materially held back by weaker formulation coherence.
Best for
Buyers comparing price and availability and okay with a middle-of-the-pack option.
Consider another option if
You want one of the best-absorbed options in this category.
Score breakdown
Tap a module to see what it measures. A 0 can reflect missing disclosure, not just a negative result.
Dosage quality
6.2/10Acceptable dosing, but not standout
Checks whether labeled ingredient amounts fall within clinically studied ranges (not just regulatory minimums). Low/0 can reflect under-dosing or missing amounts (e.g., proprietary blends).
Dose 6.2/10 · Bioavailability 4.1/10 · Coherence 0/10
Ingredient form quality suggests suboptimal ingredient forms.
This is a multi-ingredient product. The score reflects formulation quality, not efficacy for a specific health goal.
Caffeine: dose within clinically studied range (evidence A). The main limitation is that formula coherence is weak: diluted, decorative or overly complex.
Strengths
Weaknesses
Final verdict
Not a strong option overall. The product is materially held back by weaker formulation coherence.
A closer look at the main ingredients, how they influence the score, and the supporting evidence when available. Tap any ingredient to expand.
ℹ Evidence is strong, but dose is below the optimal range
A clear strength: Dose is strong and within effective ranges. The declared form supports strong absorption.
Scientific evidence
McLellan et al. systematic review caffeine and alertness
Nutritional Neuroscience • 2016
PMID: 26677204.0
Warren et al. meta-analysis caffeine and strength performance
Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research • 2010
PMID: 22840561.0
✔ Clinically effective dose with moderate supporting evidence
A clear strength: Dose is strong and within effective ranges. The declared form supports strong absorption.
Scientific evidence
Bhatt et al. meta-analysis taurine and blood pressure
Hypertension Research • 2016
PMID: 26676042.0
ℹ Dose is below the optimal range with moderate supporting evidence
A clear drag on the formula: Dose is below the ranges usually used for stronger effects. The declared form supports strong absorption.
Scientific evidence
Jongkees et al. meta-analysis tyrosine and cognitive performance under stress
Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews • 2015
PMID: 25797858.0
Banderet & Lieberman RCT tyrosine and cognitive performance under stress
Brain Research Bulletin • 1989
PMID: 2736402.0
ℹ Dose is below the optimal range with moderate supporting evidence
One of the weaker points: Dose is below the ranges usually used for stronger effects. The declared form is not one of the better-absorbed options.
Scientific evidence
Trexler et al. meta-analysis citrulline malate and exercise performance
Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research • 2019
PMID: 31977835.0
⚠ Strong evidence exists, but dose is below effective threshold
One of the weaker points: Dose is likely below clinically useful levels. The declared form is not one of the better-absorbed options.
Scientific evidence
Hobson et al. meta-analysis beta-alanine and exercise
Amino Acids • 2012
PMID: 22270875.0
⚠ Moderate evidence exists, but dose is below effective threshold
This is a limiting factor: Dose is likely below clinically useful levels.
Scientific evidence
Schwab et al. RCT betaine supplementation and homocysteine
American Journal of Clinical Nutrition • 2002
PMID: 15649952.0
Important label or formulation details that may affect how this product should be interpreted.
Formula design looks less coherent than stronger alternatives
The formulation appears less focused than better-built options.
Vitamin B6 dose looks below clinically effective levels
Declared amount falls below ranges used in human trials.
Vitamin B12 dose looks below clinically effective levels
Declared amount falls below ranges used in human trials.
Read our methodology overview to understand how SuppScoreLab combines multiple scientific dimensions into one practical score.
View methodology →This evaluation is based on the product label and declared Supplement Facts available at review time. It does not verify laboratory-tested composition, purity, or batch-level quality. This content is educational and not medical advice. Consult a qualified healthcare professional for personal health decisions. Affiliate disclosure: SuppScoreLab may earn a commission from qualifying Amazon links.
Keep exploring the database to compare better-ranked supplements and ingredient guides.
