Only budget-focused buyers with flexible standards.
Consider another option if
You care a lot about label clarity and want fewer unknowns.
Score breakdown
Tap a module to see what it measures. A 0 can reflect missing disclosure, not just a negative result.
Dosage quality
1.1/10
Dosing looks weaker than ideal
Checks whether labeled ingredient amounts fall within clinically studied ranges (not just regulatory minimums). Low/0 can reflect under-dosing or missing amounts (e.g., proprietary blends).
The supporting evidence profile is relatively strong. The main limitation is that calcium: below clinically studied range.
Strengths
The supporting evidence profile is relatively strong
The formula stays relatively clean on excipients
The formulation has a clearer overall purpose
Weaknesses
Calcium: below clinically studied range
Calcium: chemical form not specified on label
Final verdict
Not a strong option overall. The product is materially held back by weaker ingredient form quality.
Ingredient Analysis & Evidence
A closer look at the main ingredients, how they influence the score, and the supporting evidence when available. Tap any ingredient to expand.
⚠ Strong evidence exists, but dose is below effective threshold
A clear drag on the formula: Dose is likely below clinically useful levels. The label does not specify the form, so absorption quality cannot be verified.
Scientific evidence
Meta-analysis
Tang et al. meta-analysis calcium supplementation and fracture risk
This evaluation is based on the product label and declared Supplement Facts available at review time. It does not verify laboratory-tested composition, purity, or batch-level quality. This content is educational and not medical advice. Consult a qualified healthcare professional for personal health decisions. Affiliate disclosure: SuppScoreLab may earn a commission from qualifying Amazon links.
Still comparing options?
See the best Creatine supplements ranked with the same methodology, or keep exploring the database.