Confidence: 95%
B0FWV6LC4B
View on Amazon →Decision summary
A strong option overall. Its main value comes from excipient quality, but the listed weaknesses are still worth checking…
Best for
People prioritizing high absorption and overall formula quality.
Consider another option if
You need a very specific optimization beyond what the current scoring output captures.
Score breakdown
Tap a module to see what it measures. A 0 can reflect missing disclosure, not just a negative result.
Dosage quality
9.2/10Strong dosing for the intended goal
Checks whether labeled ingredient amounts fall within clinically studied ranges (not just regulatory minimums). Low/0 can reflect under-dosing or missing amounts (e.g., proprietary blends).
Explore next
Creatine: dose within clinically studied range (evidence A). The main limitation is that astragalus: below clinically studied range.
Strengths
Weaknesses
Final verdict
A strong option overall. Its main value comes from excipient quality, but the listed weaknesses are still worth checking before buying.
A closer look at the main ingredients, how they influence the score, and the supporting evidence when available. Tap any ingredient to expand.
✔ Clinically effective dose with strong supporting evidence
Strong contributor: Dose is strong and within effective ranges. The declared form supports strong absorption.
Scientific evidence
Avgerinos et al. meta-analysis creatine and cognitive function
Experimental Gerontology • 2018
PMID: 33578433.0
Brose et al. systematic review creatine and muscle strength
Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise • 2003
PMID: 12945830.0
⚠ Limited evidence exists, and dose is below effective threshold
A clear drag on the formula: Dose is likely below clinically useful levels.
Scientific evidence
Matkovic et al. RCT astragalus and allergic rhinitis
Phytotherapy Research • 2010
PMID: 23386028.0
Important label or formulation details that may affect how this product should be interpreted.
Astragalus dose looks below clinically effective levels
Declared amount falls below ranges used in human trials.
Read our methodology overview to understand how SuppScoreLab combines multiple scientific dimensions into one practical score.
View methodology →This evaluation is based on the product label and declared Supplement Facts available at review time. It does not verify laboratory-tested composition, purity, or batch-level quality. This content is educational and not medical advice. Consult a qualified healthcare professional for personal health decisions. Affiliate disclosure: SuppScoreLab may earn a commission from qualifying Amazon links.
See the best Creatine supplements ranked with the same methodology, or keep exploring the database.
