Confidence: 90%
B0BNK18P6Y
View on Amazon →SuppScoreLab compares supplement products for informational purposes. We do not sell products directly, and some links may take you to third-party retailers.
Decision summary
A middling option. It may be usable, but weaker ingredient form quality makes better alternatives worth comparing.
Best for
Buyers comparing price and availability and okay with a middle-of-the-pack option.
Consider another option if
You want one of the best-absorbed options in this category.
Score breakdown
Tap a module to see what it measures. A 0 can reflect missing disclosure, not just a negative result.
Dosage quality
5.2/10Acceptable dosing, but not standout
Checks whether labeled ingredient amounts fall within clinically studied ranges (not just regulatory minimums). Low/0 can reflect under-dosing or missing amounts (e.g., proprietary blends).
Explore next
Saffron: dose within clinically studied range (evidence B). The main limitation is that ashwagandha: below clinically studied range.
Strengths
Weaknesses
Final verdict
A middling option. It may be usable, but weaker ingredient form quality makes better alternatives worth comparing.
A closer look at the main ingredients, how they influence the score, and the supporting evidence when available. Tap any ingredient to expand.
ℹ At the minimum effective range, but below the optimal dose with moderate supporting evidence
Dose meets the minimum effective range, but is below the optimal dose used for stronger effects. A clear strength: Dose is strong and within effective ranges.
Scientific evidence
Hausenblas et al. meta-analysis saffron and depression symptoms
Journal of Integrative Medicine • 2013
PMID: 23653026.0
⚠ Strong evidence exists, but dose is below effective threshold
Dose is below the minimum effective threshold. One of the weaker points: Dose is likely below clinically useful levels. The declared form is acceptable, but not among the best-absorbed options.
Scientific evidence
Wankhede et al. RCT ashwagandha and testosterone levels
American Journal of Men's Health • 2015
PMID: 31991540.0
Chandrasekhar et al. RCT ashwagandha and cortisol in stressed adults
Indian Journal of Psychological Medicine • 2012
PMID: 23439798.0
Evidence inferred from established knowledge, not directly linked studies
Solid but not a standout: Clinical dosing guidance is limited for this ingredient.
No supporting studies or dosing references are currently available for this ingredient.
Important label or formulation details that may affect how this product should be interpreted.
Ashwagandha dose looks below clinically effective levels
Declared amount falls below ranges used in human trials.
Read our methodology overview to understand how SuppScoreLab combines multiple scientific dimensions into one practical score.
View methodology →This evaluation is based on the product label and declared Supplement Facts available at review time. It does not verify laboratory-tested composition, purity, or batch-level quality. This content is educational and not medical advice. Consult a qualified healthcare professional for personal health decisions. Affiliate disclosure: SuppScoreLab may earn a commission from qualifying Amazon links.
See the best Ashwagandha supplements ranked with the same methodology, or keep exploring the database.
