Confidence: 90%
B0DNYDR6VM
View on Amazon →Decision summary
Not a strong option overall. The product is materially held back by weaker dosing.
Best for
Buyers comparing price and availability and okay with a middle-of-the-pack option.
Consider another option if
You care a lot about label clarity and want fewer unknowns.
Score breakdown
Tap a module to see what it measures. A 0 can reflect missing disclosure, not just a negative result.
Dosage quality
3.3/10Dosing looks weaker than ideal
Checks whether labeled ingredient amounts fall within clinically studied ranges (not just regulatory minimums). Low/0 can reflect under-dosing or missing amounts (e.g., proprietary blends).
Coenzyme-q10: dose within clinically studied range (evidence B). The main limitation is that vitamin-e: below clinically studied range.
Strengths
Weaknesses
Final verdict
Not a strong option overall. The product is materially held back by weaker dosing.
A closer look at the main ingredients, how they influence the score, and the supporting evidence when available. Tap any ingredient to expand.
⚠ Dose is below commonly used clinical ranges
One of the weaker points: Dose is likely below clinically useful levels. The declared form is acceptable, but not among the best-absorbed options.
Clinical dosing guidance
Based on established dosing ranges used in clinical practice.
⚠ Moderate evidence exists, but dose may be too low to be effective
One of the weaker points: Dose is likely below clinically useful levels. The label does not specify the form, so absorption quality cannot be verified.
Scientific evidence
Eidelman et al. meta-analysis vitamin E and cardiovascular endpoints
Archives of Internal Medicine • 2004
PMID: 12750911.0
✔ Clinically effective dose with strong supporting evidence
A clear strength: Dose is strong and within effective ranges. The declared form supports strong absorption.
Scientific evidence
Mortensen et al. Q-SYMBIO trial CoQ10 and heart failure outcomes
JACC: Heart Failure • 2014
PMID: 23221577.0
Mizuno et al. RCT CoQ10 and fatigue
Nutrition • 2008
PMID: 18272900.0
✔ Clinically effective dose with moderate supporting evidence
Strong contributor: Dose is strong and within effective ranges.
Scientific evidence
Nakano et al. RCT PQQ and cognitive function in older adults
Food and Chemical Toxicology • 2012
PMID: 22020110.0
⚠ Strong evidence exists, but dose is below effective threshold
One of the weaker points: Dose is likely below clinically useful levels.
Scientific evidence
Katan et al. meta-analysis plant sterols and LDL cholesterol
Mayo Clinic Proceedings • 2003
PMID: 12716665.0
Important label or formulation details that may affect how this product should be interpreted.
Vitamin E dose looks below clinically effective levels
Declared amount falls below ranges used in human trials.
Black Pepper dose looks below clinically effective levels
Declared amount falls below ranges used in human trials.
Vitamin E form is not clearly declared
Exact ingredient form is not disclosed on the label.
Read our methodology overview to understand how SuppScoreLab combines multiple scientific dimensions into one practical score.
View methodology →This evaluation is based on the product label and declared Supplement Facts available at review time. It does not verify laboratory-tested composition, purity, or batch-level quality. This content is educational and not medical advice. Consult a qualified healthcare professional for personal health decisions. Affiliate disclosure: SuppScoreLab may earn a commission from qualifying Amazon links.
See the best CoQ10 supplements ranked with the same methodology, or keep exploring the database.
