Confidence: 90%
B0CZDK6YSC
View on Amazon →Decision summary
A middling option. It may be usable, but weaker dosing makes better alternatives worth comparing.
Best for
Buyers comparing price and availability and okay with a middle-of-the-pack option.
Consider another option if
You care a lot about label clarity and want fewer unknowns.
Score breakdown
Tap a module to see what it measures. A 0 can reflect missing disclosure, not just a negative result.
Dosage quality
4.6/10Dosing looks weaker than ideal
Checks whether labeled ingredient amounts fall within clinically studied ranges (not just regulatory minimums). Low/0 can reflect under-dosing or missing amounts (e.g., proprietary blends).
Coenzyme-q10: high-bioavailability form declared (Ubiquinol). The main limitation is that vitamin-e: below clinically studied range.
Strengths
Weaknesses
Final verdict
A middling option. It may be usable, but weaker dosing makes better alternatives worth comparing.
A closer look at the main ingredients, how they influence the score, and the supporting evidence when available. Tap any ingredient to expand.
✔ Clinically effective dose with strong supporting evidence
Adequate, but not a key strength: Dose is directionally useful, but not a standout strength. The declared form supports strong absorption.
Scientific evidence
Mortensen et al. Q-SYMBIO trial CoQ10 and heart failure outcomes
JACC: Heart Failure • 2014
PMID: 23221577.0
Mizuno et al. RCT CoQ10 and fatigue
Nutrition • 2008
PMID: 18272900.0
⚠ Moderate evidence exists, but dose may be too low to be effective
One of the weaker points: Dose is likely below clinically useful levels. The label does not specify the form, so absorption quality cannot be verified.
Scientific evidence
Eidelman et al. meta-analysis vitamin E and cardiovascular endpoints
Archives of Internal Medicine • 2004
PMID: 12750911.0
✔ Clinically effective dose with moderate supporting evidence
Strong contributor: Dose is strong and within effective ranges. The declared form is acceptable, but not among the best-absorbed options.
Scientific evidence
Nakano et al. RCT PQQ and cognitive function in older adults
Food and Chemical Toxicology • 2012
PMID: 22020110.0
⚠ Dose is below commonly used clinical ranges
One of the weaker points: Dose is likely below clinically useful levels. The declared form is acceptable, but not among the best-absorbed options.
Clinical dosing guidance
Based on established dosing ranges used in clinical practice.
⚠ Strong evidence exists, but dose is below effective threshold
One of the weaker points: Dose is likely below clinically useful levels.
Scientific evidence
Katan et al. meta-analysis plant sterols and LDL cholesterol
Mayo Clinic Proceedings • 2003
PMID: 12716665.0
Important label or formulation details that may affect how this product should be interpreted.
Vitamin E dose looks below clinically effective levels
Declared amount falls below ranges used in human trials.
Vitamin E form is not clearly declared
Exact ingredient form is not disclosed on the label.
Formula design looks less coherent than stronger alternatives
The formulation appears less focused than better-built options.
Read our methodology overview to understand how SuppScoreLab combines multiple scientific dimensions into one practical score.
View methodology →This evaluation is based on the product label and declared Supplement Facts available at review time. It does not verify laboratory-tested composition, purity, or batch-level quality. This content is educational and not medical advice. Consult a qualified healthcare professional for personal health decisions. Affiliate disclosure: SuppScoreLab may earn a commission from qualifying Amazon links.
See the best CoQ10 supplements ranked with the same methodology, or keep exploring the database.
