SuppScoreLab compares supplement products for informational purposes. We do not sell products directly, and some links may take you to third-party retailers.
Decision summary
CONSIDERAVERAGE
A middling option. It may be usable, but weaker dosing makes better alternatives worth comparing.
Buyers comparing price and availability and okay with a middle-of-the-pack option.
Consider another option if
You care a lot about label clarity and want fewer unknowns.
Score breakdown
Tap a module to see what it measures. A 0 can reflect missing disclosure, not just a negative result.
Dosage quality
3.9/10
Dosing looks weaker than ideal
Checks whether labeled ingredient amounts fall within clinically studied ranges (not just regulatory minimums). Low/0 can reflect under-dosing or missing amounts (e.g., proprietary blends).
The formula stays relatively clean on excipients. The main limitation is that formula coherence is weak: diluted, decorative or overly complex.
Strengths
The formula stays relatively clean on excipients
Label transparency is better than average
The safety profile looks solid
Weaknesses
Formula coherence is weak: diluted, decorative or overly complex
Selenium: below clinically studied range
Selenium: chemical form not specified on label
Final verdict
A middling option. It may be usable, but weaker dosing makes better alternatives worth comparing.
Ingredient Analysis & Evidence
A closer look at the main ingredients, how they influence the score, and the supporting evidence when available. Tap any ingredient to expand.
ℹ At the minimum effective range, but below the optimal dose; evidence is strong
Dose meets the minimum effective range, but is below the optimal dose used for stronger effects. This is a limiting factor: Dose is below the ranges usually used for stronger effects. The declared form is acceptable, but not among the best-absorbed options.
Scientific evidence
Meta-analysis
Mortensen et al. Q-SYMBIO trial CoQ10 and heart failure outcomes
ℹ Dose is within established clinical ranges, but lacks direct studies
Dose meets the minimum effective range, but is below the optimal dose used for stronger effects. One of the weaker points: Dose is below the ranges usually used for stronger effects.
Clinical dosing guidance
Based on established dosing ranges used in clinical practice.
Min effective: 5 mgOptimal: 10 mgUpper: 20 mgGrade: B
ℹ Dose is within established clinical ranges, but lacks direct studies
Dose meets the minimum effective range, but is below the optimal dose used for stronger effects. A clear drag on the formula: Dose is below the ranges usually used for stronger effects.
Clinical dosing guidance
Based on established dosing ranges used in clinical practice.
Min effective: 5 mgOptimal: 10 mgUpper: 20 mgGrade: B
ℹ Dose is within established clinical ranges, but lacks direct studies
Dose meets the minimum effective range, but is below the optimal dose used for stronger effects. A clear drag on the formula: Dose is below the ranges usually used for stronger effects. The declared form is acceptable, but not among the best-absorbed options.
Clinical dosing guidance
Based on established dosing ranges used in clinical practice.
Min effective: 1.1 mgOptimal: 10 mgUpper: 40 mgGrade: B
⚠ Moderate evidence exists, but dose is below effective threshold
Dose is below the minimum effective threshold. A clear drag on the formula: Dose is likely below clinically useful levels. The label does not specify the form, so absorption quality cannot be verified.
This evaluation is based on the product label and declared Supplement Facts available at review time. It does not verify laboratory-tested composition, purity, or batch-level quality. This content is educational and not medical advice. Consult a qualified healthcare professional for personal health decisions. Affiliate disclosure: SuppScoreLab may earn a commission from qualifying Amazon links.
Still comparing options?
See the best CoQ10 supplements ranked with the same methodology, or keep exploring the database.
