Confidence: 80%
B0G5Q9BZQC
View on Amazon →SuppScoreLab compares supplement products for informational purposes. We do not sell products directly, and some links may take you to third-party retailers.
Decision summary
A middling option. It may be usable, but weaker ingredient form quality makes better alternatives worth comparing.
Best for
Buyers comparing price and availability and okay with a middle-of-the-pack option.
Consider another option if
You care a lot about label clarity and want fewer unknowns.
Score breakdown
Tap a module to see what it measures. A 0 can reflect missing disclosure, not just a negative result.
Dosage quality
7.2/10Generally solid dosing
Checks whether labeled ingredient amounts fall within clinically studied ranges (not just regulatory minimums). Low/0 can reflect under-dosing or missing amounts (e.g., proprietary blends).
Explore next
Dose 7.2/10 · Bioavailability 0.6/10 · Coherence 2/10
Ingredient form quality suggests suboptimal ingredient forms.
Some ingredient forms are not declared on the label.
This is a multi-ingredient product. The score reflects formulation quality, not efficacy for a specific health goal.
The formula stays relatively clean on excipients. The main limitation is that chromium: chemical form not specified on label.
Strengths
Weaknesses
Final verdict
A middling option. It may be usable, but weaker ingredient form quality makes better alternatives worth comparing.
A closer look at the main ingredients, how they influence the score, and the supporting evidence when available. Tap any ingredient to expand.
✔ Clinically effective dose with moderate supporting evidence
Dose is within the optimal/effective range. This is a limiting factor: Dose is directionally useful, but not a standout strength. The label does not specify the form, so absorption quality cannot be verified.
Scientific evidence
Balk et al. systematic review chromium picolinate and glycemic control
Diabetes Technology & Therapeutics • 2007
PMID: 17519436.0
✔ Dose aligned with moderate supporting evidence
Solid but not a standout: Clinical dosing guidance is limited for this ingredient.
Scientific evidence
Launholt et al. meta-analysis vinegar and blood glucose
Journal of Evidence-Based Integrative Medicine • 2020
PMID: 36164664.0
✔ Clinically effective dose with strong supporting evidence
Dose is within the optimal/effective range. This is a limiting factor: Dose is directionally useful, but not a standout strength. The declared form is not one of the better-absorbed options.
Scientific evidence
Singh & Das Cochrane review zinc for common cold
Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews • 2011
PMID: 22553186.0
Prasad et al. RCT zinc supplementation and testosterone in elderly men
Nutrition • 1996
PMID: 8875519.0
ℹ Dose is within established clinical ranges, but lacks direct studies
Dose meets the minimum effective range, but is below the optimal dose used for stronger effects. One of the weaker points: Dose is below the ranges usually used for stronger effects.
Clinical dosing guidance
Based on established dosing ranges used in clinical practice.
⚠ Strong evidence exists, but dose is below effective threshold
Dose is below the minimum effective threshold. One of the weaker points: Dose is likely below clinically useful levels.
Scientific evidence
Lan et al. meta-analysis berberine and lipid profile
Journal of Ethnopharmacology • 2015
PMID: 26448206.0
Dong et al. meta-analysis berberine and glycemic control in type 2 diabetes
Metabolism • 2012
PMID: 22162995.0
Evidence inferred from established knowledge, not directly linked studies
Adequate, but not a key strength: Clinical dosing guidance is limited for this ingredient.
No supporting studies or dosing references are currently available for this ingredient.
Important label or formulation details that may affect how this product should be interpreted.
Chromium form is not clearly declared
Exact ingredient form is not disclosed on the label.
Formula design looks less coherent than stronger alternatives
The formulation appears less focused than better-built options.
Berberine dose looks below clinically effective levels
Declared amount falls below ranges used in human trials.
Read our methodology overview to understand how SuppScoreLab combines multiple scientific dimensions into one practical score.
View methodology →This evaluation is based on the product label and declared Supplement Facts available at review time. It does not verify laboratory-tested composition, purity, or batch-level quality. This content is educational and not medical advice. Consult a qualified healthcare professional for personal health decisions. Affiliate disclosure: SuppScoreLab may earn a commission from qualifying Amazon links.
See the best Berberine supplements ranked with the same methodology, or keep exploring the database.
