Confidence: 90%
B09Q5C32SD
View on Amazon →SuppScoreLab compares supplement products for informational purposes. We do not sell products directly, and some links may take you to third-party retailers.
Decision summary
A middling option. It may be usable, but weaker safety makes better alternatives worth comparing.
Best for
Buyers comparing price and availability and okay with a middle-of-the-pack option.
Consider another option if
You care a lot about ingredient quality and effectiveness.
Score breakdown
Tap a module to see what it measures. A 0 can reflect missing disclosure, not just a negative result.
Dosage quality
5.7/10Acceptable dosing, but not standout
Checks whether labeled ingredient amounts fall within clinically studied ranges (not just regulatory minimums). Low/0 can reflect under-dosing or missing amounts (e.g., proprietary blends).
Explore next
The formula stays relatively clean on excipients. The main limitation is that critical safety flag limits final score.
Strengths
Weaknesses
Final verdict
A middling option. It may be usable, but weaker safety makes better alternatives worth comparing.
A closer look at the main ingredients, how they influence the score, and the supporting evidence when available. Tap any ingredient to expand.
ℹ Dose is within established clinical ranges, but lacks direct studies
Dose meets the minimum effective range, but is below the optimal dose used for stronger effects. Solid but not a standout: Dose is directionally useful, but not a standout strength. The declared form is acceptable, but not among the best-absorbed options.
Clinical dosing guidance
Based on established dosing ranges used in clinical practice.
⚠ Strong evidence exists, but dose is above the upper dose range
Dose is above the upper dose range. One of the weaker points: Dose is higher than typically recommended ranges. The declared form is acceptable, but not among the best-absorbed options.
Scientific evidence
Wankhede et al. RCT ashwagandha and testosterone levels
American Journal of Men's Health • 2015
PMID: 31991540.0
Chandrasekhar et al. RCT ashwagandha and cortisol in stressed adults
Indian Journal of Psychological Medicine • 2012
PMID: 23439798.0
Important label or formulation details that may affect how this product should be interpreted.
Safety-related concerns may affect suitability
This product may deserve extra caution depending on context.
Read our methodology overview to understand how SuppScoreLab combines multiple scientific dimensions into one practical score.
View methodology →This evaluation is based on the product label and declared Supplement Facts available at review time. It does not verify laboratory-tested composition, purity, or batch-level quality. This content is educational and not medical advice. Consult a qualified healthcare professional for personal health decisions. Affiliate disclosure: SuppScoreLab may earn a commission from qualifying Amazon links.
See the best Ashwagandha supplements ranked with the same methodology, or keep exploring the database.
