EVIDENCE-BASED SUPPLEMENT SCORING
7.0/10
SOLID OPTION

Confidence: 95%

Ageless Male Max Chewable Nitric Oxide Booster Supplement for Men – High Potency Ashwagandha Extract to Boost Workouts, Muscle & Performance, Reduce Stress, Support Sleep - 100 Count

Ageless Male Max Chewable Nitric Oxide Booster Supplement for Men – High Potency Ashwagandha Extract to Boost Workouts, Muscle & Performance, Reduce Stress, Support Sleep - 100 Count

B09ZBKXL69

View on Amazon →

SuppScoreLab compares supplement products for informational purposes. We do not sell products directly, and some links may take you to third-party retailers.

Decision summary

CONSIDERSOLID OPTION

A middling option. It may be usable, but weaker formulation coherence makes better alternatives worth comparing.

Best for

People prioritizing high absorption and overall formula quality.

Consider another option if

You prefer fully transparent formulas over blends and ambiguous labeling.

Score breakdown

Tap a module to see what it measures. A 0 can reflect missing disclosure, not just a negative result.

Dosage quality

4.7/10

Dosing looks weaker than ideal

Checks whether labeled ingredient amounts fall within clinically studied ranges (not just regulatory minimums). Low/0 can reflect under-dosing or missing amounts (e.g., proprietary blends).

Multi-ingredient formulation analysis

Dose 4.7/10 · Bioavailability 6.6/10 · Coherence 0/10

Dose quality suggests a diluted formulation.

A proprietary blend limits independent dose verification.

This is a multi-ingredient product. The score reflects formulation quality, not efficacy for a specific health goal.

Score summary

Zinc: dose within clinically studied range (evidence A). The main limitation is that proprietary blend prevents independent dose verification.

Strengths

Zinc: dose within clinically studied range (evidence A)
Vitamin-d: high-bioavailability form declared (Cholecalciferol (D3))

Weaknesses

Proprietary blend prevents independent dose verification
Formula coherence is weak: diluted, decorative or overly complex
Vitamin-d: below clinically studied range

Final verdict

A middling option. It may be usable, but weaker formulation coherence makes better alternatives worth comparing.

Ingredient Analysis & Evidence

A closer look at the main ingredients, how they influence the score, and the supporting evidence when available. Tap any ingredient to expand.

ℹ At the minimum effective range, but below the optimal dose; evidence is strong

Dose meets the minimum effective range, but is below the optimal dose used for stronger effects. One of the weaker points: Dose is below the ranges usually used for stronger effects. The declared form is acceptable, but not among the best-absorbed options.

Scientific evidence

RCT

Wankhede et al. RCT ashwagandha and testosterone levels

American Journal of Men's Health • 2015

PMID: 31991540.0

RCT

Chandrasekhar et al. RCT ashwagandha and cortisol in stressed adults

Indian Journal of Psychological Medicine • 2012

PMID: 23439798.0

✔ Clinically effective dose with strong supporting evidence

Dose is within the optimal/effective range. A clear strength: Dose is strong and within effective ranges. The declared form is acceptable, but not among the best-absorbed options.

Scientific evidence

Meta-analysis

Singh & Das Cochrane review zinc for common cold

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews • 2011

PMID: 22553186.0

RCT

Prasad et al. RCT zinc supplementation and testosterone in elderly men

Nutrition • 1996

PMID: 8875519.0

⚠ Strong evidence exists, but dose may be too low to be effective

A clear drag on the formula: Dose is likely below clinically useful levels. The declared form supports strong absorption.

Scientific evidence

Meta-analysis

Martineau et al. meta-analysis vitamin D supplementation and respiratory infections

BMJ • 2017

PMID: 26864360.0

Meta-analysis

Bischoff-Ferrari et al. meta-analysis vitamin D fracture prevention

BMJ • 2009

PMID: 20198382.0

⚠ Dose is below commonly used clinical ranges

Dose is below the minimum effective threshold. One of the weaker points: Dose is likely below clinically useful levels. The declared form is acceptable, but not among the best-absorbed options.

Clinical dosing guidance

Based on established dosing ranges used in clinical practice.

Min effective: 15 mgOptimal: 500 mgUpper: 3000 mgGrade: A

⚠ Moderate evidence exists, but dose is below effective threshold

Dose is below the minimum effective threshold. One of the weaker points: Dose is likely below clinically useful levels. The declared form is acceptable, but not among the best-absorbed options.

Scientific evidence

RCT

Bryan et al. RCT on B vitamins and cognitive function in older adults

American Journal of Clinical Nutrition • 2002

PMID: 16920179.0

⚠ Moderate evidence exists, but dose is below effective threshold

Dose is below the minimum effective threshold. One of the weaker points: Dose is likely below clinically useful levels. The declared form is acceptable, but not among the best-absorbed options.

Scientific evidence

Meta-analysis

Clarke et al. meta-analysis B vitamins and cognitive decline

American Journal of Clinical Nutrition • 2007

PMID: 22243457.0

RCT

Shipton & Thachil review of vitamin B12 deficiency and fatigue

Postgraduate Medical Journal • 2015

PMID: 20648714.0

Ageless Male Max Chewable Nitric Oxide Booster Supplement for Men – High Potency Ashwagandha Extract to Boost Workouts, Muscle & Performance, Reduce Stress, Support Sleep - 100 Count

Ageless Male Max Chewable Nitric Oxide Booster Supplement for Men – High Potency Ashwagandha Extract to Boost Workouts, Muscle & Performance, Reduce Stress, Support Sleep - 100 Count

Warnings & notes

Important label or formulation details that may affect how this product should be interpreted.

i

Proprietary blend limits dose transparency

Exact ingredient amounts cannot be verified clearly.

Info

Formula design looks less coherent than stronger alternatives

The formulation appears less focused than better-built options.

Note
!

Vitamin D dose looks below clinically effective levels

Declared amount falls below ranges used in human trials.

Warning

Methodology

Read our methodology overview to understand how SuppScoreLab combines multiple scientific dimensions into one practical score.

View methodology →

This evaluation is based on the product label and declared Supplement Facts available at review time. It does not verify laboratory-tested composition, purity, or batch-level quality. This content is educational and not medical advice. Consult a qualified healthcare professional for personal health decisions. Affiliate disclosure: SuppScoreLab may earn a commission from qualifying Amazon links.

Still comparing options?

See the best Ashwagandha supplements ranked with the same methodology, or keep exploring the database.

As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.