Only budget-focused buyers with flexible standards.
Consider another option if
You care a lot about label clarity and want fewer unknowns.
Score breakdown
Tap a module to see what it measures. A 0 can reflect missing disclosure, not just a negative result.
Dosage quality
0.6/10
Dosing looks weaker than ideal
Checks whether labeled ingredient amounts fall within clinically studied ranges (not just regulatory minimums). Low/0 can reflect under-dosing or missing amounts (e.g., proprietary blends).
The supporting evidence profile is relatively strong. The main limitation is that potassium: below clinically studied range.
Strengths
The supporting evidence profile is relatively strong
The formula stays relatively clean on excipients
The safety profile looks solid
Weaknesses
Potassium: below clinically studied range
Potassium: chemical form not specified on label
Formula coherence is weak: diluted, decorative or overly complex
Final verdict
Not a strong option overall. The product is materially held back by weaker ingredient form quality.
Ingredient Analysis & Evidence
A closer look at the main ingredients, how they influence the score, and the supporting evidence when available. Tap any ingredient to expand.
⚠ Dose is below commonly used clinical ranges
This is a limiting factor: Dose is likely below clinically useful levels. The label does not specify the form, so absorption quality cannot be verified.
Clinical dosing guidance
Based on established dosing ranges used in clinical practice.
Min effective: 1500 mgOptimal: 2600 mgUpper: 5000 mgGrade: A
⚠ Moderate evidence exists, but dose is below effective threshold
A clear drag on the formula: Dose is likely below clinically useful levels. The label does not specify the form, so absorption quality cannot be verified.
Scientific evidence
Meta-analysis
Pasricha et al. systematic review iron and fatigue in non-anaemic women
⚠ Strong evidence exists, but dose is below effective threshold
A clear drag on the formula: Dose is likely below clinically useful levels. The label does not specify the form, so absorption quality cannot be verified.
Scientific evidence
Meta-analysis
Tang et al. meta-analysis calcium supplementation and fracture risk
This evaluation is based on the product label and declared Supplement Facts available at review time. It does not verify laboratory-tested composition, purity, or batch-level quality. This content is educational and not medical advice. Consult a qualified healthcare professional for personal health decisions. Affiliate disclosure: SuppScoreLab may earn a commission from qualifying Amazon links.
Still comparing options?
See the best Protein Powder supplements ranked with the same methodology, or keep exploring the database.