Confidence: 80%
Decision summary
A solid product, but not a clean win. The main trade-off is weaker ingredient form quality.
Best for
People prioritizing high absorption and overall formula quality.
Consider another option if
You care a lot about label clarity and want fewer unknowns.
Score breakdown
Tap a module to see what it measures. A 0 can reflect missing disclosure, not just a negative result.
Dosage quality
8.6/10Strong dosing for the intended goal
Checks whether labeled ingredient amounts fall within clinically studied ranges (not just regulatory minimums). Low/0 can reflect under-dosing or missing amounts (e.g., proprietary blends).
Explore next
The supporting evidence profile is relatively strong. The main limitation is that rose-hips: no form data available — bio score = 0.
Strengths
Weaknesses
Final verdict
A solid product, but not a clean win. The main trade-off is weaker ingredient form quality.
A closer look at the main ingredients, how they influence the score, and the supporting evidence when available. Tap any ingredient to expand.
Evidence inferred from established knowledge, not directly linked studies
Adequate, but not a key strength: Clinical dosing guidance is limited for this ingredient.
No supporting studies or dosing references are currently available for this ingredient.
✔ Clinically effective dose with strong supporting evidence
A clear strength: Dose is strong and within effective ranges. The declared form is acceptable, but not among the best-absorbed options.
Scientific evidence
Hemila & Chalker Cochrane review vitamin C and common cold duration
Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews • 2013
PMID: 23440782.0
Padayatty et al. RCT on vitamin C antioxidant capacity in healthy adults
Journal of the American College of Nutrition • 2001
PMID: 11684527.0
Important label or formulation details that may affect how this product should be interpreted.
There is a formulation caveat worth noting
Rose-hips: no form data available — bio score = 0
Some label details are missing or unclear
Incomplete disclosure makes the product harder to evaluate confidently.
Read our methodology overview to understand how SuppScoreLab combines multiple scientific dimensions into one practical score.
View methodology →This evaluation is based on the product label and declared Supplement Facts available at review time. It does not verify laboratory-tested composition, purity, or batch-level quality. This content is educational and not medical advice. Consult a qualified healthcare professional for personal health decisions. Affiliate disclosure: SuppScoreLab may earn a commission from qualifying Amazon links.
See the best Vitamin C supplements ranked with the same methodology, or keep exploring the database.
