Confidence: 80%
B08D3XJT6G
View on Amazon →Decision summary
A middling option. It may be usable, but weaker formulation coherence makes better alternatives worth comparing.
Best for
Buyers comparing price and availability and okay with a middle-of-the-pack option.
Consider another option if
You care a lot about label clarity and want fewer unknowns.
Score breakdown
Tap a module to see what it measures. A 0 can reflect missing disclosure, not just a negative result.
Dosage quality
7.1/10Generally solid dosing
Checks whether labeled ingredient amounts fall within clinically studied ranges (not just regulatory minimums). Low/0 can reflect under-dosing or missing amounts (e.g., proprietary blends).
Explore next
Dose 7.1/10 · Bioavailability 0.2/10 · Coherence 0/10
Ingredient form quality suggests suboptimal ingredient forms.
Some ingredient forms are not declared on the label.
This is a multi-ingredient product. The score reflects formulation quality, not efficacy for a specific health goal.
Ashwagandha: dose within clinically studied range (evidence A). The main limitation is that ashwagandha: chemical form not specified on label.
Strengths
Weaknesses
Final verdict
A middling option. It may be usable, but weaker formulation coherence makes better alternatives worth comparing.
A closer look at the main ingredients, how they influence the score, and the supporting evidence when available. Tap any ingredient to expand.
✔ Clinically effective dose with strong supporting evidence
One of the weaker points: Dose is strong and within effective ranges. The label does not specify the form, so absorption quality cannot be verified.
Scientific evidence
Wankhede et al. RCT ashwagandha and testosterone levels
American Journal of Men's Health • 2015
PMID: 31991540.0
Chandrasekhar et al. RCT ashwagandha and cortisol in stressed adults
Indian Journal of Psychological Medicine • 2012
PMID: 23439798.0
Evidence inferred from established knowledge, not directly linked studies
Supports the formula, but not a major driver: Clinical dosing guidance is limited for this ingredient.
No supporting studies or dosing references are currently available for this ingredient.
ℹ Dose is within established clinical ranges, but lacks direct studies
One of the weaker points: Dose is below the ranges usually used for stronger effects.
Clinical dosing guidance
Based on established dosing ranges used in clinical practice.
⚠ Moderate evidence exists, but dose is below effective threshold
This is a limiting factor: Dose is likely below clinically useful levels.
Scientific evidence
MacDonald et al. Cochrane review saw palmetto and benign prostatic hyperplasia
Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews • 2012
PMID: 24237566.0
⚠ Moderate evidence exists, but dose is below effective threshold
A clear drag on the formula: Dose is likely below clinically useful levels.
Scientific evidence
Hamzah & Yusof RCT tongkat ali and testosterone in physically active men
British Journal of Sports Medicine • 2003
PMID: 23754792.0
⚠ Moderate evidence exists, but dose is below effective threshold
A clear drag on the formula: Dose is likely below clinically useful levels.
Scientific evidence
Steels et al. RCT fenugreek and testosterone in healthy men
Phytotherapy Research • 2011
PMID: 21312304.0
Important label or formulation details that may affect how this product should be interpreted.
Ashwagandha form is not clearly declared
Exact ingredient form is not disclosed on the label.
Formula design looks less coherent than stronger alternatives
The formulation appears less focused than better-built options.
Saw Palmetto dose looks below clinically effective levels
Declared amount falls below ranges used in human trials.
Read our methodology overview to understand how SuppScoreLab combines multiple scientific dimensions into one practical score.
View methodology →This evaluation is based on the product label and declared Supplement Facts available at review time. It does not verify laboratory-tested composition, purity, or batch-level quality. This content is educational and not medical advice. Consult a qualified healthcare professional for personal health decisions. Affiliate disclosure: SuppScoreLab may earn a commission from qualifying Amazon links.
See the best Omega-3 supplements ranked with the same methodology, or keep exploring the database.
