Confidence: 85%
B0D9NLGV6W
View on Amazon →Decision summary
A middling option. It may be usable, but weaker formulation coherence makes better alternatives worth comparing.
Best for
People prioritizing high absorption and overall formula quality.
Consider another option if
You prefer fully transparent formulas over blends and ambiguous labeling.
Score breakdown
Tap a module to see what it measures. A 0 can reflect missing disclosure, not just a negative result.
Dosage quality
4.8/10Dosing looks weaker than ideal
Checks whether labeled ingredient amounts fall within clinically studied ranges (not just regulatory minimums). Low/0 can reflect under-dosing or missing amounts (e.g., proprietary blends).
Explore next
Dose 4.8/10 · Bioavailability 7.8/10 · Coherence 0/10
Dose quality suggests a diluted formulation.
A proprietary blend limits independent dose verification.
This is a multi-ingredient product. The score reflects formulation quality, not efficacy for a specific health goal.
Chromium: high-bioavailability form declared (Chromium Picolinate). The main limitation is that proprietary blend prevents independent dose verification.
Strengths
Weaknesses
Final verdict
A middling option. It may be usable, but weaker formulation coherence makes better alternatives worth comparing.
A closer look at the main ingredients, how they influence the score, and the supporting evidence when available. Tap any ingredient to expand.
✔ Clinically effective dose with moderate supporting evidence
Adequate, but not a key strength: Dose is directionally useful, but not a standout strength. The declared form supports strong absorption.
Scientific evidence
Balk et al. systematic review chromium picolinate and glycemic control
Diabetes Technology & Therapeutics • 2007
PMID: 17519436.0
✔ Clinically effective dose with strong supporting evidence
One of the weaker points: Dose is higher than typically recommended ranges. The declared form supports strong absorption.
Scientific evidence
Lan et al. meta-analysis berberine and lipid profile
Journal of Ethnopharmacology • 2015
PMID: 26448206.0
Dong et al. meta-analysis berberine and glycemic control in type 2 diabetes
Metabolism • 2012
PMID: 22162995.0
⚠ Strong evidence exists, but dose is below effective threshold
This is a limiting factor: Dose is likely below clinically useful levels. The declared form supports strong absorption.
Scientific evidence
McLellan et al. systematic review caffeine and alertness
Nutritional Neuroscience • 2016
PMID: 26677204.0
Warren et al. meta-analysis caffeine and strength performance
Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research • 2010
PMID: 22840561.0
⚠ Strong evidence exists, but dose is below effective threshold
One of the weaker points: Dose is likely below clinically useful levels. The label does not specify the form, so absorption quality cannot be verified.
Scientific evidence
Zheng et al. meta-analysis green tea and oxidative stress
PLoS ONE • 2016
PMID: 24675074.0
Hursel et al. meta-analysis green tea and body composition
International Journal of Obesity • 2009
PMID: 21969342.0
⚠ Dose is below commonly used clinical ranges
This is a limiting factor: Dose is likely below clinically useful levels.
Clinical dosing guidance
Based on established dosing ranges used in clinical practice.
Evidence inferred from established knowledge, not directly linked studies
Supports the formula, but not a major driver: Clinical dosing guidance is limited for this ingredient.
No supporting studies or dosing references are currently available for this ingredient.
Important label or formulation details that may affect how this product should be interpreted.
Proprietary blend limits dose transparency
Exact ingredient amounts cannot be verified clearly.
Formula design looks less coherent than stronger alternatives
The formulation appears less focused than better-built options.
Green Tea dose looks below clinically effective levels
Declared amount falls below ranges used in human trials.
Read our methodology overview to understand how SuppScoreLab combines multiple scientific dimensions into one practical score.
View methodology →This evaluation is based on the product label and declared Supplement Facts available at review time. It does not verify laboratory-tested composition, purity, or batch-level quality. This content is educational and not medical advice. Consult a qualified healthcare professional for personal health decisions. Affiliate disclosure: SuppScoreLab may earn a commission from qualifying Amazon links.
See the best Berberine supplements ranked with the same methodology, or keep exploring the database.
